**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.

Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.

Should Act 4 reduced energy cost come back permanently?

GreywardenGreywarden Posts: 843 ★★★★
edited September 2017 in General Discussion
I pretty much spammed Act 4 all week and best I could 100% was 2 and a half chapters. The energy cost and ridiculously long paths/number of paths is a bit much in Act 4.

Should Act 4 reduced energy cost come back permanently? 30 votes

Yes
63%
Noob_2yrsstakDoctorAntManMillybearRiise81Username819273943KingCrooksAkshay_BhuradiaHellhound214Tmasters1984The_flash007JustArandomGuyhereAnujmyPUNCAKEBatang_xAwesomeness44Leepower12mike071787latif72 19 votes
No
36%
superunknown012Whododo872LocoMotivesKronos987654321Eb0ny-O-M4wStefffGoken2345DropfaithVeggettaDave_the_destroyerR4GE 11 votes

Comments

  • Eb0ny-O-M4wEb0ny-O-M4w Posts: 13,734 ★★★★★
    No
    Is fair to be the way it is now.
  • edited September 2017
    We're happy you guys enjoyed the Energy reduction in Act 4! Unfortunately, we don't have an intention of making this permanent at this time.

    Additionally, please do not create polls that act as petitions in the forums. Petitions are not allowed by the forum rules.
This discussion has been closed.