Atticus9090 wrote: » Also, I feel as if the Sentinels in AQ are getting more intelligent (The AI). I’m getting way less parties off than I used to nowadays, and sometimes the Sentinels are reacting faster to my attacks than I can even react to theirs. Anyone else seeing this in their AQ gameplay? Or am I just paranoid
danielmath wrote: » Atticus9090 wrote: » Also, I feel as if the Sentinels in AQ are getting more intelligent (The AI). I’m getting way less parties off than I used to nowadays, and sometimes the Sentinels are reacting faster to my attacks than I can even react to theirs. Anyone else seeing this in their AQ gameplay? Or am I just paranoid less parties should help your gameplay no? sobriety is good!
Dago88 wrote: » I’m getting a lot of parries that don’t stun and evades that don’t evade yet they say parry and dexterity on the screen. Also being hit through blocks and parry.
Atticus9090 wrote: » Also, I feel as if the Sentinels in AQ are getting more intelligent (The AI).
Atticus9090 wrote: » Dago88 wrote: » I’m getting a lot of parries that don’t stun and evades that don’t evade yet they say parry and dexterity on the screen. Also being hit through blocks and parry. Paries that don’t actually parry? Against the Sentinels? Dang
AxeCopFire wrote: » Atticus9090 wrote: » Also, I feel as if the Sentinels in AQ are getting more intelligent (The AI). Omg. The singularity. It's happening.
Dago88 wrote: » Yes parries that don’t stun but it still says parry on the screen. And it’s not just sentinels it’s anyone and it’s random.
Ærroneous wrote: » Can't remember off hand, but they were against champs that should have stunned when parried. Wasn't because of any ability reduction mechanic.
Marri wrote: » Ærroneous wrote: » Can't remember off hand, but they were against champs that should have stunned when parried. Wasn't because of any ability reduction mechanic. And without any evidence we should just believe that you know all the ways any champ can decrease ability accuracy? C'mon man, you gotta give us something if you want a reasonable response. My take on this is that it was AAR (science sentinel can do that)