I just think one of the side-effects of so much hype with the best Champs is people are so blasé about the rest. It's that all-or-nothing approach that is extremely limiting. They're either called worth it, or garbage.
I'll never understand for the life of me why people sit on stacks of Gems, waiting for the perfect options. If you have a number of them, use some of them at least. Lol.
I'll never understand for the life of me why people sit on stacks of Gems, waiting for the perfect options. If you have a number of them, use some of them at least. Lol. That s the precise reason you probably dont go past master event quest of if anything uncollected.The so “hyped” champions you talk about arent hyped, they are necessary to progress in the game.Id be very eager to see you use your gems and items on other else than those champs, and then pay a visit to variant LoL or act 6.Thats why i stay on my point: you dont have the knowledge necessary for you to even ask yourself why ppl waits for those champions. After all if you struggle that much in keeping an arena streak, maybe, just maybe you arent the best option on here to dish knowledge. Which would still be fine and your own opinion if in any of your post you didnt imply what you say is basically the common thought and view of the game.
I just disagree. People are too picky and critical.
I just disagree. People are too picky and critical. Champs are tools and most of them are mediocre tools that cannot progress players. This is why players are picky and critical.
I still stand by what I said. There are more than are commonly-used that are valuable.
I still stand by what I said. There are more than are commonly-used that are valuable. Can you give any examples of underused champs that are useful in variant or act 6?
I still stand by what I said. There are more than are commonly-used that are valuable. Can you give any examples of underused champs that are useful in variant or act 6? You're still not getting the point of what I'm saying. It's not about this content vs. that content. It's about the entire mentality of only picking the best and calling the rest trash. They're not trash by default. That's not how it works. There are other Champs that can hold their own and perform well. Some aren't overtly-OP, and require some time to get to know their mechanics. There's this whole focus on the "Heavy Hitters" that says, "Welp. They don't do what these ones do, so they're useless.". Not the case.
That's a trapping argument because I could comprise a list of Champs that are useful and overlooked, and all it would be met with is, "They're no good.", or "This one does it better.". You can't level with people who have a closed-mind. You can however, suggest that they open their minds to exploring other possibilities.
I just disagree. People are too picky and critical. Champs are tools and most of them are mediocre tools that cannot progress players. This is why players are picky and critical. Most of them aren't even taken out of the toolbox and sharpened long enough to know whether they can be helpful or not. If they're not mandated for Prestige, OP in some immediate way, or good for Defense, they're not used. Half the time people only go on word-of-mouth advice, or rely on one Fight in ROL to base their findings, and don't spend adequate time with them. Profiles all look the same because people do what everyone else does. I don't dispute that there are some on the lower end, but there's a great deal more that have unique and useful Abilities than just 15%. I do not agree with the number that are tossed to the waist side and labeled Trash. That's as rash as it is inaccurate. Please do start putting out some examples and specifics rather than just general statements with nothing to back them up. Which champs exactly that stray from the norm are you using to successfully complete endgame content that everyone else is overlooking? There's plenty of low damage/high utility champs that flop in ROL but still get ranked highly by many players because they have use in endgame content. Sure you can breeze through act 4 and master EQ with R3-R4 Civil Warrior, Superior Iron Man, Loki etc etc but bring that same crew into Variant, 6.1, even the latter half of Act 5 and tell me how satisfied you are that you poured high end rank materials and AGs into them. There's a reason the same 15% of champs make up the top couple thousand profiles and its because those champs get **** done.
I just disagree. People are too picky and critical. Champs are tools and most of them are mediocre tools that cannot progress players. This is why players are picky and critical. Most of them aren't even taken out of the toolbox and sharpened long enough to know whether they can be helpful or not. If they're not mandated for Prestige, OP in some immediate way, or good for Defense, they're not used. Half the time people only go on word-of-mouth advice, or rely on one Fight in ROL to base their findings, and don't spend adequate time with them. Profiles all look the same because people do what everyone else does. I don't dispute that there are some on the lower end, but there's a great deal more that have unique and useful Abilities than just 15%. I do not agree with the number that are tossed to the waist side and labeled Trash. That's as rash as it is inaccurate.
That's a trapping argument because I could comprise a list of Champs that are useful and overlooked, and all it would be met with is, "They're no good.", or "This one does it better.". You can't level with people who have a closed-mind. You can however, suggest that they open their minds to exploring other possibilities. This entire thread you have not made a valid point. I've had 3 mystic AGs for months. Are you saying I should've used one on juggernaut? Or Hood or Guillotine? I just pulled a Ghost Rider and used one, and now I'm saving the other ones for Voodoo and SS. can you honestly say awakening one of those other champs would be more helpful?
That's a trapping argument because I could comprise a list of Champs that are useful and overlooked, and all it would be met with is, "They're no good.", or "This one does it better.". You can't level with people who have a closed-mind. You can however, suggest that they open their minds to exploring other possibilities. This entire thread you have not made a valid point. I've had 3 mystic AGs for months. Are you saying I should've used one on juggernaut? Or Hood or Guillotine? I just pulled a Ghost Rider and used one, and now I'm saving the other ones for Voodoo and SS. can you honestly say awakening one of those other champs would be more helpful? Hood or Guillotine, I would consider, yes. Try making that point with people who won't listen. That's why I'm not wasting my energy arguing specific Champs. It's a trap. And here I thought it was because you didn't have a valid point to make 😂😂😂All jokes aside though its comical how ironic it is when you say things like that when everyone who's responded to you has stated specific reasons and examples why they do what they do and you've gone with "that's how I feel" but still have the temerity to pretend everyone else is wrong and just unable to see the wisdom in your perspective. You should consider just once that maybe you're wrong and its not always everyone else.
That's a trapping argument because I could comprise a list of Champs that are useful and overlooked, and all it would be met with is, "They're no good.", or "This one does it better.". You can't level with people who have a closed-mind. You can however, suggest that they open their minds to exploring other possibilities. This entire thread you have not made a valid point. I've had 3 mystic AGs for months. Are you saying I should've used one on juggernaut? Or Hood or Guillotine? I just pulled a Ghost Rider and used one, and now I'm saving the other ones for Voodoo and SS. can you honestly say awakening one of those other champs would be more helpful? Hood or Guillotine, I would consider, yes. Try making that point with people who won't listen. That's why I'm not wasting my energy arguing specific Champs. It's a trap.
My point is exactly what I said, and you're not actually trying to debate it with me at all. In the words of Faye Dunaway, "This ain't my first time at The Rodeo.".
I don't subscribe to others telling me who is and isn't a bad Champ. I form my own views. I'm sorry if that concept is foreign to you, but contrary to your statement, I play the game more fully by not restricting my opinions on Champs based on status quo.
I don't subscribe to others telling me who is and isn't a bad Champ. I form my own views. I'm sorry if that concept is foreign to you, but contrary to your statement, I play the game more fully by not restricting my opinions on Champs based on status quo. You don't have views, you just spew nonsense general statements and pretend you know something. Again, what champs are you using that you believe the consensus is wrong about? Share your alleged views with us and we can discuss the merits of them. Otherwise you've said your piece, at least a dozen times now, so move on. If you're entirely unwilling to elaborate on your generic general statements then why are you still talking? You haven't said anything new from your first post here to your last. Who isn't a bad champ, in your enlightened opinion, that is generally considered to be? Please share these views of yours or stop posting here.