Instead of 2 new champs every month would you...

btothebrayn

If Kabam could give up 1 or more months and use that time to do something to improve the contest at the cost of not adding new champs, what would you want? Please be respectful. This is meant to generate positive discussion.

XxLoganTDCxX

They always add champs

btothebrayn

Gates = eliminate star gates for all of act 6.2.

btothebrayn

XxLoganTDCxX said:

They always add champs

That's the point of the poll, if they DIDNT, and had time to do something else to improve the contest, what would you want done?

LoctiteSuperGlue

All of that and more.

Demonzfyre

The team that develops new champs is different than the team that works on fixing issues. Always has been, always will be. Content and champs are planned months ahead.

The problem most people don't realize is that in testing the game, they are way more limited than the community realizes. Yes, there are somethings that should have been seen during stage testing but may bugs and issues boil down to device type which given how many supported devices there are, would be impossible for them to test thoroughly before release. Reducing to one champ per month won't alleviate those types of issues.

Eb0ny-O-M4w

There are different people on all of them. They can add new champions and do the rest at the same time

btothebrayn

Demonzfyre said:

The team that develops new champs is different than the team that works on fixing issues. Always has been, always will be. Content and champs are planned months ahead.

The problem most people don't realize is that in testing the game, they are way more limited than the community realizes. Yes, there are somethings that should have been seen during stage testing but may bugs and issues boil down to device type which given how many supported devices there are, would be impossible for them to test thoroughly before release. Reducing to one champ per month won't alleviate those types of issues.

Except for balancing 2 old champs that's the same team that releases the new champs isn't it? They could delay their schedule if they wanted to and focus on old champs one month.

Either way, kabam as a company has limited resources and could incentivize or prioritize different aspects of the game. It's just a fun poll to see what people want out of the game. Can still vote and say what you might want even if we don't have to give up 2 new champs each month.

MaxtheSilent

I would like to see a shorter cycle for reworks / rebalancing. There will always be very desirable and undesirable champs but I think Kabam recognizes the gap between the oldest low tier champs and newer low tier champs. For instance If rather have a Man-Thing than a Magneto any day. Man-Thing isn't amazing ( I really want him to be) but he's usable in the right scenario whereas Magneto isn't. So I'd like to see that gap closed for more than 4 champs a year given the size of the champ pool. I think Kabam is on that path but it'd be nice to move down it quicker. Things like Nexus crystals help mitigate this issue if they become more available.

Unknown

This content has been removed.

Massapeal

Mix masteries and add new ones.

Repto23

It would be cool if they would add 1 champ and update 1, that way they still make their money on new champs but also improve the current game. Featured crystal could have the just be both of those champs or something

Unknown

This content has been removed.