That’s danmged that passive danmged from he’s abtily.
That’s danmged that passive danmged from he’s abtily. No massacre has no defensive damage
I wouldn’t say it’s intended since the prerequisite of Masacre’s bat being ignited has not been met. Least it’s only one fight and we’re not likely to see the node combo again.
I wouldn’t say it’s intended since the prerequisite of Masacre’s bat being ignited has not been met. Least it’s only one fight and we’re not likely to see the node combo again. It clearly says “each time incinerate EFFECT fails to apply” that means passives and debuffs, while bat can only apply incinerate debuff, so It clearly says that applies to all incinerate effects from Bat and from other sources.
I wouldn’t say it’s intended since the prerequisite of Masacre’s bat being ignited has not been met. Least it’s only one fight and we’re not likely to see the node combo again. It clearly says “each time incinerate EFFECT fails to apply” that means passives and debuffs, while bat can only apply incinerate debuff, so It clearly says that applies to all incinerate effects from Bat and from other sources. Yes it certainly does under “ignited”, this denotes when Masacre has ignited his bat; which he has not in any evidence provided.
I wouldn’t say it’s intended since the prerequisite of Masacre’s bat being ignited has not been met. Least it’s only one fight and we’re not likely to see the node combo again. It clearly says “each time incinerate EFFECT fails to apply” that means passives and debuffs, while bat can only apply incinerate debuff, so It clearly says that applies to all incinerate effects from Bat and from other sources. Yes it certainly does under “ignited”, this denotes when Masacre has ignited his bat; which he has not in any evidence provided. It's only there, because it needs to be somewhere, right? The wording does absolutely hint at this being an intended interaction as nOux pointed out.
I wouldn’t say it’s intended since the prerequisite of Masacre’s bat being ignited has not been met. Least it’s only one fight and we’re not likely to see the node combo again. It clearly says “each time incinerate EFFECT fails to apply” that means passives and debuffs, while bat can only apply incinerate debuff, so It clearly says that applies to all incinerate effects from Bat and from other sources. Yes it certainly does under “ignited”, this denotes when Masacre has ignited his bat; which he has not in any evidence provided. It would be your truth if it would say “each time incinerate DEBUFF fails to apply” but it says EFFECT. That means from all EFFECTS debuffs and passives. ( u probably know the difference between passive and debuff effects)After describing about bat incinerate debuffs next paragraph says “ These incinerate debuffs have their duration increased...” it clearly mentions bat incinerate debuffs, while failing to apply effects it could be from bat debuffs or other sources passive effects. It does not say “Each time these incinerate debuffs fails to apply...”
@CoatHang3r so running by your logic IMIW + Aggression armor node autoblock should not work as well?
@CoatHang3r so running by your logic IMIW + Aggression armor node autoblock should not work as well? Whut? It clearly states 4 stacks on any armor effect. (You do play this game right?)
@CoatHang3r so running by your logic IMIW + Aggression armor node autoblock should not work as well? Whut? It clearly states 4 stacks on any armor effect. (You do play this game right?) Let me copy your answer just i will change from ignited to armor. Again, this is under the category of Armor. Go ahead an keep ignoring the prerequisite Category the ability is placed in; which has not been met.
@CoatHang3r so running by your logic IMIW + Aggression armor node autoblock should not work as well? Whut? It clearly states 4 stacks on any armor effect. (You do play this game right?) Let me copy your answer just i will change from ignited to armor. Again, this is under the category of Armor. Go ahead an keep ignoring the prerequisite Category the ability is placed in; which has not been met.So rubber and glue, ffs... Ironman’s molecular armor gives him the ability to use any armor effect for his abilities. Masacre when ignited has the ability to do direct damage in lieu of incinerating an immune target; His bat is not in the ignited state. Are you practicing rocket surgery?You can’t just take abilities out of context.
@CoatHang3r so running by your logic IMIW + Aggression armor node autoblock should not work as well? Whut? It clearly states 4 stacks on any armor effect. (You do play this game right?) Let me copy your answer just i will change from ignited to armor. Again, this is under the category of Armor. Go ahead an keep ignoring the prerequisite Category the ability is placed in; which has not been met.So rubber and glue, ffs... Ironman’s molecular armor gives him the ability to use any armor effect for his abilities. Masacre when ignited has the ability to do direct damage in lieu of incinerating an immune target; His bat is not in the ignited state. Are you practicing rocket surgery?You can’t just take abilities out of context. The funniest part is that u are taking out of context when it says clear as a day. Bat places incinerate debuff. While it says fail to apply effect, not debuff. If it would only apply to bat incinerate debuff it would say debuff. It does not require interpretation when it says as clear as this.
@CoatHang3r so running by your logic IMIW + Aggression armor node autoblock should not work as well? Whut? It clearly states 4 stacks on any armor effect. (You do play this game right?) Let me copy your answer just i will change from ignited to armor. Again, this is under the category of Armor. Go ahead an keep ignoring the prerequisite Category the ability is placed in; which has not been met.So rubber and glue, ffs... Ironman’s molecular armor gives him the ability to use any armor effect for his abilities. Masacre when ignited has the ability to do direct damage in lieu of incinerating an immune target; His bat is not in the ignited state. Are you practicing rocket surgery?You can’t just take abilities out of context.*Well maybe we should. “My MaSACrE DoSEn’t gain 15146 attack when striking a block.” See it says it right there, in a red box no less.
@CoatHang3r so running by your logic IMIW + Aggression armor node autoblock should not work as well? Whut? It clearly states 4 stacks on any armor effect. (You do play this game right?) Let me copy your answer just i will change from ignited to armor. Again, this is under the category of Armor. Go ahead an keep ignoring the prerequisite Category the ability is placed in; which has not been met.So rubber and glue, ffs... Ironman’s molecular armor gives him the ability to use any armor effect for his abilities. Masacre when ignited has the ability to do direct damage in lieu of incinerating an immune target; His bat is not in the ignited state. Are you practicing rocket surgery?You can’t just take abilities out of context.*Well maybe we should. “My MaSACrE DoSEn’t gain 15146 attack when striking a block.” See it says it right there, in a red box no less. Now you are just grasping for straws. Its just getting sad at this point
Simple question for you. Why it says effect, while everywhere else it says debuff?
Simple question for you. Why it says effect, while everywhere else it says debuff? This has nothing to do with why Masacre isn’t placing incinerates with each bat hit and gaining power (and ridiculous attack) while striking a block.
Simple question for you. Why it says effect, while everywhere else it says debuff? This has nothing to do with why Masacre isn’t placing incinerates with each bat hit and gaining power (and ridiculous attack) while striking a block. U did not answer my question.
Simple question for you. Why it says effect, while everywhere else it says debuff? This has nothing to do with why Masacre isn’t placing incinerates with each bat hit and gaining power (and ridiculous attack) while striking a block. U did not answer my question. No, I do not have the current price of tea in China.Mine now.
So basically what you are trying to say that Kabam made a bug not only in mechanic but in wording as well?