AW 15.0 and iron man/superior iron man exploit

NinjAlanNinjAlan Member Posts: 358 ★★★
in General Discussion
I apologize if this topic has been covered. What is Kabams plan to discourage this exploit with the removal of defender kill points? For those who don't know, people will use iron man/superior iron man until they are at 30% health then timeout. When the new fight begins, they will trigger arc overload and begin the fight again with a near full health bar, rinse, repeat. Removing defender kills will only make this already existing behavior worse.

Comments

  • RotmgmoddyRotmgmoddy Member Posts: 916 ★★★
    Erm, that's not exactly an exploit in the first place. Because firstly, you are losing health if you do that (even though yes, it can be healed back) and secondly, it's not 100% reliable because of assassination.
  • NinjAlanNinjAlan Member Posts: 358 ★★★
    It's 82% reliable, and people are already doing this, removing defender kills will certainly encourage the behavior, people can take dozens of attempts at minibosses/bosses using this method
  • Eb0ny-O-M4wEb0ny-O-M4w Member Posts: 14,027 ★★★★★
    After the real exploit, everyone is talking about random stuff and call them exploits ... Just stop it.
    This isn't an exploit. You are penalized for doing it.
  • No_More_HeroesNo_More_Heroes Member Posts: 471 ★★
    Sounds super boring. At least IM and SIM actually has some value with this.
  • RotmgmoddyRotmgmoddy Member Posts: 916 ★★★
    NinjAlan wrote: »
    It's 82% reliable, and people are already doing this, removing defender kills will certainly encourage the behavior, people can take dozens of attempts at minibosses/bosses using this method

    So how exactly would it be encouraging the behavior? If people are already going to die, they'd probably want to time out instead so that their champ is still alive at the end, even though it gives a defender kill. I doubt they'd say
    "Oh, I think I'm just gonna take this death and give the enemy a kill"
    rather than
    "I'm going to die if I continue, just gonna pause and timeout so I can survive and get more health next fight even though I give the enemy a kill"
    Of course they'll choose the latter, most of the time.
  • NinjAlanNinjAlan Member Posts: 358 ★★★
    There is no penalty for taking multiple attempts at a node without item use when there are no points given for defender kills
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • CrazywolfCrazywolf Member Posts: 34
    I over all think he is a great character but the overload can be useless under right circumstances
  • Mcord11758Mcord11758 Member Posts: 1,249 ★★★★
    edited August 2017
    May find a use for this strategy at times using my ultron
  • weavileweavile Member Posts: 288
    please it's not as consistent as you think, why do you think that people never bring those two into high tier aq? If you try this in war it'll be like this: ok 20% health, time out and heal the next fight, and then you start the fight Juggernaut punch right through your block and you die.
  • DarkestDestroyerDarkestDestroyer Member Posts: 2,887 ★★★★★
    eXtripa69 wrote: »
    After the real exploit, everyone is talking about random stuff and call them exploits ... Just stop it.
    This isn't an exploit. You are penalized for doing it.

    But you won't be penalised if defender kills are removed
  • Eb0ny-O-M4wEb0ny-O-M4w Member Posts: 14,027 ★★★★★
    DarkestDestroyer wrote: »
    eXtripa69 wrote: »
    After the real exploit, everyone is talking about random stuff and call them exploits ... Just stop it.
    This isn't an exploit. You are penalized for doing it.

    But you won't be penalised if defender kills are removed

    You lose half HP and you risk your own death
  • RektorRektor Member Posts: 678 ★★★
    this will be done with ultron and voodoo alot more than the ironmen, but yes, it will be done by many.
Sign In or Register to comment.