Options

Guilly 2099 on masochism with flow is a joke

2»

Comments

  • GamerGamer Member Posts: 12,033 ★★★★★

    Guillys degen on masochism node should be passive and not trigger regen and warlocks armor on Buffett should be passive against havoks

    That’s wil simplet make warlock the worst option for havok pasive don’t count
  • Deadlygamer98Deadlygamer98 Member Posts: 743 ★★★
    If they remove masochism and flow, then you would complain about how defenders do damage and place debuffs on you.
  • Kevo9513Kevo9513 Member Posts: 356 ★★
    Kill her with cmm before she kills you.
  • Dr_Z01dbergDr_Z01dberg Member Posts: 512 ★★★

    ImGodMF said:

    Doctor prescribes a large dose of gitgud.

    If you don't like hard nodes don't play hard wars.

    Name the counter to her that’s easy and havok
    On buffet that’s easy and straight forward
    Warlock, void, quake, Medusa (G99) etc
  • Dr_Z01dbergDr_Z01dberg Member Posts: 512 ★★★

    Masochism needs to be taken out of war

    Mate you need to find a nice T6 ally if you can’t deal with machonism then your playing in the wrong tier
  • SpideyFunkoSpideyFunko Member Posts: 21,973 ★★★★★

    With guilly you gotta deal with invisibility. She shouldn’t be allowed to go invisible vs cosmics

    you just knock her down, or armor break her!

    so with Aarkus, parry, parry again, then do a three hit combo and boom armor break, she can’t go invisible hooray!

    also, unless I’m wrong (which I might be) his armor breaks shouldn’t trigger masochism no? Because they fall off after you are a certain distance away?
  • ThatGuyYouSaw235ThatGuyYouSaw235 Member Posts: 3,765 ★★★★★

    With guilly you gotta deal with invisibility. She shouldn’t be allowed to go invisible vs cosmics

    you just knock her down, or armor break her!

    so with Aarkus, parry, parry again, then do a three hit combo and boom armor break, she can’t go invisible hooray!

    also, unless I’m wrong (which I might be) his armor breaks shouldn’t trigger masochism no? Because they fall off after you are a certain distance away?
    Wouldn't Sym and Claire work too?

    With Claire you can try and weave in a Special Attack thanks to the immunity power gain, to put cloak on cooldown and the nullify charges sort the armour.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Mr_PlatypusMr_Platypus Member Posts: 2,779 ★★★★★
    This guy is really trying to act like he deserves plat 4 rewards whilst not being able to handle masochism nodes lmao.
    Maybe I should go find a Plat 1 alliance because I can handle masochism...
  • SpideyFunkoSpideyFunko Member Posts: 21,973 ★★★★★

    With guilly you gotta deal with invisibility. She shouldn’t be allowed to go invisible vs cosmics

    you just knock her down, or armor break her!

    so with Aarkus, parry, parry again, then do a three hit combo and boom armor break, she can’t go invisible hooray!

    also, unless I’m wrong (which I might be) his armor breaks shouldn’t trigger masochism no? Because they fall off after you are a certain distance away?
    Wouldn't Sym and Claire work too?

    With Claire you can try and weave in a Special Attack thanks to the immunity power gain, to put cloak on cooldown and the nullify charges sort the armour.
    see, even more counters @Getridofwar!

    also, i don’t know because I don’t have Claire.
  • Mr_PlatypusMr_Platypus Member Posts: 2,779 ★★★★★

    What’s the counter

    Medusa
    Aarkus
    Quake
    Nebula
    Being semi competent at the game...
  • SpideyFunkoSpideyFunko Member Posts: 21,973 ★★★★★

    What’s the counter

    Medusa
    Aarkus
    Quake
    Nebula
    Being semi competent at the game...
    ah but Quake is “cheating”
  • MauledMauled Member, Guardian Posts: 3,956 Guardian
    Just don’t respond to this kid. Read his name.

    As an aside if you can’t deal with Masochism, how are you in an alliance with global nodes?
  • Panchulon21Panchulon21 Member Posts: 2,605 ★★★★★
    We have people complaining about legitimate nodes and you post about masochism.

    An act 5 node.....
  • lowlevelplayerlowlevelplayer Member Posts: 4,292 ★★★★★
    git gud.
    How did you even complete 5.2.4?
    How did you ever end up in tier 5 AW?
    Is he just a troll?
  • BitterSteelBitterSteel Member Posts: 9,264 ★★★★★

    "Every 7 seconds the next Debuff is removed...."
    Not all of them.

    I think it may be a bug but I think it purifies all debuffs applied at the same time. Whenever I use an SP2 with Hype on masochism, I see the stun text pop up and then it's purified along with the armor break
    I believe that has to do with them being applied all at once. That's been brought up before, and some Champs operate by applying multiple Debuffs at once, rather than sequentially.
    Now that I think about it, I guess the game can't "prioritize" which debuff to remove first so I think it just gets rid of both at the same time
    That’s exactly it, I believe there’s the same interaction with Corvus when he triggers armour break on parries. But a different interaction when you use Thor, since his armour break triggers because of stun
  • Dr_Z01dbergDr_Z01dberg Member Posts: 512 ★★★

    Guilly and warlocks armor should be passive to counter the Buffett node

    This comment shows your knowledge level.

    Now kids, what do you think will happen if we change warlock’s armour to passive and take him into a Havok matchup?

    Yes, your correct you’ll no longer be immune to plasma detonation

    All you need to do is get 1 infection and there is no more regen

    Seriously mate there is no shame in not knowing but drop the attitude and not properly thought through ideas.

    If your struggling with machonism then you need to find a different ally after season rewards (although I have a sneaking suspicion that decision may be made for you judging by your knowledge level of I’m honest)
Sign In or Register to comment.