**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.

Super sweet Alliance Matchmaking!! Again Kabam Did it..

SonicSubhoSonicSubho Posts: 8 ★
edited September 2020 in General Discussion
Alliance Prestige -- 9k Vs 10k.
Alliance Rating -- 21M vs 44M
Avg. Member Rating -- 700k vs 1400k

Based on which cases this is a


Matchmaking

Comments

  • SonicSubhoSonicSubho Posts: 8 ★
    Kabam, please either you remove MatchMackings Remove. Or you made it fair.😶
    Alliance Prestige -- 9k Vs 10k.
    Alliance Rating -- 21M vs 44M
    Avg. Member Rating -- 700k vs 1400k
  • MaxGamingMaxGaming Posts: 3,204 ★★★★★
    last time i was in a war the other alliance had r4 and r2 4*s and 5*s super easy
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Posts: 36,242 ★★★★★
    There's a discussion open already. Feel free to join.
  • ABOMBABOMB Posts: 564 ★★★
    I feel your pain man
  • PulyamanPulyaman Posts: 2,365 ★★★★★
    CoatHang3r said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    There's a discussion open already. Feel free to join.

    That is just the same tired argument for 3 months going, no thanks, don’t care about how you refuse to acknowledge how you cannot factor in feelings and fears into a competition for ladder rewards; super simple if your competing for you spot at the watering hole you’ll be seeing lions pushing aside rats and rats pushing aside insects. Super sad people don’t see they’re just feeding your illogic.
    So, are you acknowledging that the Lions are pushing aside rats instead of competing with other lions? :wink:
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Posts: 4,965 ★★★★★
    Pulyaman said:

    CoatHang3r said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    There's a discussion open already. Feel free to join.

    That is just the same tired argument for 3 months going, no thanks, don’t care about how you refuse to acknowledge how you cannot factor in feelings and fears into a competition for ladder rewards; super simple if your competing for you spot at the watering hole you’ll be seeing lions pushing aside rats and rats pushing aside insects. Super sad people don’t see they’re just feeding your illogic.
    So, are you acknowledging that the Lions are pushing aside rats instead of competing with other lions? :wink:
    Duh, that’s the whole point of the post. This is a competition not a socialist experiment.
  • Shamir51Shamir51 Posts: 849 ★★★★
    Yawn
  • ThedancingkidThedancingkid Posts: 274 ★★
    A 1k prestige diff at this stage isn’t that big, you have all r5, they may have a handful of r3, the handicap you face is still lower than the increased attack and health bonus nodes if you climb up the ranks.
  • AzKicker316AzKicker316 Posts: 2,264 ★★★★★
    Of course the OP didn't include the one rating that actually matters..... war rating! 1399 vs 1406 looks like solid matchmaking to me!!!
  • PulyamanPulyaman Posts: 2,365 ★★★★★
    CoatHang3r said:

    Pulyaman said:

    CoatHang3r said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    There's a discussion open already. Feel free to join.

    That is just the same tired argument for 3 months going, no thanks, don’t care about how you refuse to acknowledge how you cannot factor in feelings and fears into a competition for ladder rewards; super simple if your competing for you spot at the watering hole you’ll be seeing lions pushing aside rats and rats pushing aside insects. Super sad people don’t see they’re just feeding your illogic.
    So, are you acknowledging that the Lions are pushing aside rats instead of competing with other lions? :wink:
    Duh, that’s the whole point of the post. This is a competition not a socialist experiment.
    I got your point, your example was funny though. Pretty much what we are saying. War rating is wrong for a lot of alliances, so using that metric means the matchmaking is inherently flawed.
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Posts: 4,965 ★★★★★
    Pulyaman said:

    CoatHang3r said:

    Pulyaman said:

    CoatHang3r said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    There's a discussion open already. Feel free to join.

    That is just the same tired argument for 3 months going, no thanks, don’t care about how you refuse to acknowledge how you cannot factor in feelings and fears into a competition for ladder rewards; super simple if your competing for you spot at the watering hole you’ll be seeing lions pushing aside rats and rats pushing aside insects. Super sad people don’t see they’re just feeding your illogic.
    So, are you acknowledging that the Lions are pushing aside rats instead of competing with other lions? :wink:
    Duh, that’s the whole point of the post. This is a competition not a socialist experiment.
    I got your point, your example was funny though. Pretty much what we are saying. War rating is wrong for a lot of alliances, so using that metric means the matchmaking is inherently flawed.
    Match making is exactly what it should be since this is a zero sum competition. Maybe y’all should be arguing for a rat league where you drink from rat pools instead of a communal pool.
  • LormifLormif Posts: 7,369 ★★★★★
    I dont understand the complaint. In the old system this matchup was s till possible, your prestige is within 10% of each other, your war rating is similar. What do you want, something based on alliance rating? my god that would be a terrible system, you would be steamrolled every fight as people sold off their 4*s and below to get an supposed advantage.

    Again alliance rating means very little in your ability in war.
  • Panchulon21Panchulon21 Posts: 2,605 ★★★★★
    Looks even to me. War rating is off by 7. Not bad. Next time post when the war rating is off by 100+
  • _Reef_Reef Posts: 265 ★
    We're a 14 mil alliance vs 14 mil alliance. they have 30 members, we have 24, they got destroyed but according to you that wouldnt be a fair match up either.
Sign In or Register to comment.