Alliance war suggestion

The_man001

Is it better to loose 3 bg aw than winning 2bg aw in terms of points? Tier6 aw.
Share ur opinions with data or observation if possible

zuffy

Assuming you explore 100% in 3 bg, then a loss will score more than a 2 BG win, that will be approximately 510k points vs 442k points. The problem is you will not stay at tier 6 forever. Keep losing and you drop in tier with a lower multipliers. If you can win some wars with 3 bg, that would be the way to go for more points imo. But if you can’t fill all 3 bg, then I would rather go with 2 full bg instead.

The_man001

zuffy said:

Assuming you explore 100% in 3 bg, then a loss will score more than a 2 BG win, that will be approximately 510k points vs 442k points. The problem is you will not stay at tier 6 forever. Keep losing and you drop in tier with a lower multipliers. If you can win some wars with 3 bg, that would be the way to go for more points imo. But if you can’t fill all 3 bg, then I would rather go with 2 full bg instead.

Okay thanks.. We do well on 2bg aw. 100% all the time and win a lot. We loose in 2bg mainly cause of diversity. Our alliance isn't in a place to fill all 3 bg. And i dont want it either. Cause some people including me can have problems somedays so they are unable to join aw. That's why we do 2bg. But winning on 2bg doesn't increase rank much and 1 loss costs huge rank difference in case of 2bg. We were gold 2 2bg last season. But this season wasn't very fortunate and we fell to gold 3.