**KNOWN AW ISSUE**
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
**KNOWN BG ISSUE**
We are aware of an issue with the seeding for the beginning of the BG season.
We are adding rewards to higher progression brackets to offset the additional grind.
More information here.
We are aware of an issue with the seeding for the beginning of the BG season.
We are adding rewards to higher progression brackets to offset the additional grind.
More information here.
**Arcade is being extra tricky with his Murder Box...**
It appears Arcade has been non-cooperative in his approach to this month's side quest and presented his clues in a nonsensical order. Lucky you, Summoners, we have our best and brightest on the case and those clues should now be a lot more straightforward. While messing around in Arcade's files we came across a phrase, highlighted and bolded, with sparkles and pointy arrows: "the abode for the dead" ... Maybe that will help you along the way!
It appears Arcade has been non-cooperative in his approach to this month's side quest and presented his clues in a nonsensical order. Lucky you, Summoners, we have our best and brightest on the case and those clues should now be a lot more straightforward. While messing around in Arcade's files we came across a phrase, highlighted and bolded, with sparkles and pointy arrows: "the abode for the dead" ... Maybe that will help you along the way!
Options
Comments
So by having Moleman bug for 1yr +months.. it is matter of time wherein he would be corrected.. albeit fingers crossed kabam makes some changes and allow Moleman to keep his true-strike while in frenzy.
Yes please.. whatever happens, he is still a good champion.
I’d like to know why, when Symbiote Supreme had a year-long mismatch between his description and his actual functionality, a mistake that he was launched with, the description was changed rather than the ability. But in the case of MM, the ability was changed. The cases are nearly identical, and the decision of what to change was the opposite. The only seemingly commonality in the decision is that the outcome of each was option that hurt the players more.
Please revert Moleman to his pre-“fix” state and update his description. Follow the precedent you already set with Moleman.
This was not the case when ultron was "fixed" when bugged as we realised that because of the sp3 bug it could make him too good for everest content.
MM is an unique skill champ and abilities should not be nerfed. Rather his description should reflect his abilities. I saw Kabam jax's response but this reflects how poorly game developers know how champions are being used in actual game. It is not just an issue of communication disconnect but more than that, developers do not know how champions are being used which is the bigger issue than communication.
So I would request kabam on behalf of my alliance to match moleman's description to his abilities not the other way around.
That's why I've put mine 6r3. Moreover it's fun to play and letting him keeping its true accuracy (in some condition) during frenzy compensate the loss of purifying debuff. That's why it's well balanced.
I really hope the moleman kit will stay as it is in the game... and only its description will be updated !
Fred
Changing his Kit to “If Moleman reaches 10 Monster Mass while he has true accuracy active he will lose the true accuracy. It can only be reactivated once his Monster Mass has depleted and a new cycle begins”
Or…. leave him how he is. Why should there be a compromise at this point 18 months in. This add nothing to the broken game and annoys a bunch of people for no reason at all. How is this priority, should be off the table. Have someone edit 1 sentence i a description and move on to other issues.
Archangel is getting a correction after 5 years.
I’m sure you could find so many discrepancies if you went looking. It was likely that Moleman was bugged but it was nowhere near confirmed or guaranteed. We had no reason to believe it either way since Kabam never deigned to comment.
Right, we can’t. Because Kabam never said whether it was a bug or not.
I’m saying without Kabam’s confirmation either way we had no way to tell if it was a description issue or a bug.
What you’ve said there is quite clearly nothing to do with what I asked.
How did you know that Kabam viewed it as a bug without them confirming it?