**KNOWN AW ISSUE**
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Options
Comments
- how many rank down will it cover? Can I take my 6* r4 back to r1? What’s the cutoff for ranking down?
- if I used a r3 to 4 skill gem from act7 exploration, will I get the gem back?
- if I used a generic 3 to 4 from 4th July deal, will I get a generic back?
- If he’s one of the 3 r4 champs that got me the paragon title, will ranking him down make me thronebreaker again?
Would love some clarification before rdt are issued @Kabam Miike @Kabam Zibiit
Nuke against r4 defender, no suicides
Seems unnecessary but I guess someone in Kabam HQ sat in front of a spreadsheet and worked out this “fix” will sell a few more health potions.
I have missed the official response from Kabam regarding the rank down ticket. If anyone know where it is could be so kind to drop the link to it, many thanks.
Quite hard to find as it’s in the middle of all the threads
might sound stupid but this is my first time, will get the iso and catalysts back? if not, then I'll just let him be r3 lol,still serves me in arena though.
thanks.
What will happen after RDTs are out? Some ppl will rank him down, others don’t. But, it will stick in the players memory that you guys insisted on nerfing a champ that wasn’t overpowered and disappointing player base.
Give it another thought, listen to players, keep him as he was and that will give you credit with the players whom are playing the game despite the bugs..
1. You keep True accuracy (in Frenzy or not) if you are below 10 monstermass.
2. You loose true accuracy when above 10 monstermass (Frenzy or not).
I'm not to judge what is right, but I'm just saying that the description can confuse us as players, specific due to we had a lot of posts regarding this (if they still exist) last year and nothing was done about it.
They communicated the change both in this thread (which could be hard to find in posterity but addresses those who are knee deep in this thread), and as an official news announcement (easier to find).
Doesn’t this have nothing to do with the number of MM? Frenzy with any # of MM disables it.
Against evade champs, that’s what I do- drop a single heavy, and then finish the fight w frenzy.
Am I understanding this right guys?
The fundamental idea seems to be, if there's a long standing bug, and the players don't like it, they can berate Kabam forever until it gets fixed. The longer it persists, the worse it is. There's never a time when the players should just accept a bug they don't like. However, if the bug is something the players do like, they should be allowed to demand that it remain, and the longer it persists, the more valid that demand should be considered.
Basically, whenever there's a discrepancy in the game, the players should get to decide how it is resolved. Which is basically saying the players should dictate how the game evolves, completely ad hoc, according to their whims.
To me, that's a dangerous thing to even contemplate, as I would almost certainly not want to play a game run by a committee of its most vocal players. And this isn't even a case where you could claim special circumstances, because the player community (or at least its most vocally critical parts) doesn't believe in special circumstances unless they operate in their favor.
Kabam has not demonstrated that they are the sharpest dev team in the world, but I would still rather play their game than any conceivable Bizarro version run by any group of players of the game. Unless that group of players was run by me, in which case I would want to play it, but most of the rest of you almost certainly wouldn't.