should battleground have 5 bans or keep 3

Benjygl5nBenjygl5n Member Posts: 34 ★
edited March 2023 in Suggestions and Requests
personally i think they should make it 5 bans but i do understand the 3 bans to make it challenging
Post edited by Kabam Zanzibar on

Comments

  • CoppinCoppin Member Posts: 2,601 ★★★★★
    Ban 24
  • Draconic_12Draconic_12 Member Posts: 997 ★★★★★
    SpideyFunko said:

    being able to ban 1/6th of a deck doesn’t sound that fun to me

    Completely dumb idea. Along with the issues that are absolutely railing bgs
  • LetheLatteLetheLatte Member Posts: 115 ★
    This idea doea sound a little dumb, 3 bans is enough really, better to learn on how to counter certain champs
  • VydraVydra Member Posts: 125 ★★
    Blacklists and whitelists will be introduced soon enough. So that’s your 5 bans lol
  • GinjabredMonstaGinjabredMonsta Member, Guardian Posts: 6,494 Guardian
    That’s not what the mode needs at all
  • PikoluPikolu Member, Guardian Posts: 8,241 Guardian
    Sometimes I need the whole 30 seconds to just pick 3 champions I don't want to face or want them to use, if I had to pick 5, then I sometimes wouldn't have enough time to make a thoughtful decision. BGs are also long enough as is and I don't want a longer banning phase just to accommodate the 5 bans.
  • NastyPhishNastyPhish Member Posts: 583 ★★★
    IMO no more bans. Maybe a whitelist champ that can’t be banned. And maybe draft one more champ. (8 total) But still have 3 fights. Have more counters for last fight.
  • nIHSEANnIHSEAN Member Posts: 67 ★
    I get where you are coming from.
    Nimrod, torch, Archangel, magneto they shut down so many characters.

    Bug spenders will always have the roster advantage, not only one gets hammered in selecting defenders but also suffer in picking reliable attacker.

    Just embrace the fact that ftp player can never be #1 in any roster vs roster mode and play AQ to have peace of mind
Sign In or Register to comment.