Let’s say all my champs are 15 to 13 k. And the opponents champs are 23 to 20 k. That’s not an even match up. Matches need to be more even
Let’s say all my champs are 15 to 13 k. And the opponents champs are 23 to 20 k. That’s not an even match up. Matches need to be more even Even doesn’t meant fair.It’s a competition, matches aren’t supposed and shouldn’t be strictly even, because then it wouldn’t be a competition.
Let’s say all my champs are 15 to 13 k. And the opponents champs are 23 to 20 k. That’s not an even match up. Matches need to be more even Even doesn’t meant fair.It’s a competition, matches aren’t supposed and shouldn’t be strictly even, because then it wouldn’t be a competition. No, but as we've discussed at-length in the past, the competition shouldn't start out with vast differences either.
Let’s say all my champs are 15 to 13 k. And the opponents champs are 23 to 20 k. That’s not an even match up. Matches need to be more even Even doesn’t meant fair.It’s a competition, matches aren’t supposed and shouldn’t be strictly even, because then it wouldn’t be a competition. No, but as we've discussed at-length in the past, the competition shouldn't start out with vast differences either. We have currently 9 VT tiers with Prestige matchmaking (Bronze3 -Gold1), meaning you can’t have vast roster differences at these tiers.So OP to have vast different roster match ups, should be at Platinum tiers, which most people agree it’s a good point for the competition to open.I’m not totally against Prestige matchmaking, I’ve supported the idea of it at earlier VT tiers to encourage participation, as it happens now.Only thing I would change if I was Kabam, would be gradually remove Prestige matchmaking from Gold1 to Platinum2 (Platinum1 full random), so people would gradually face stiffer competition, instead of suddenly removing it at Platinum3 and have people suddenly face much harder competition and naturally complaining for that.