Bad matchmaking in battlegrounds
Shadowking79
Member Posts: 96 ★
I'm uncollected player and most of the time when I play battlegrounds
The opponent is beyond my level please fix the matchmaking
5
Shadowking79
Member Posts: 96 ★
I'm uncollected player and most of the time when I play battlegrounds
The opponent is beyond my level please fix the matchmaking
Comments
Matchmaking isn't broken. There's a lot more people playing right now because of the deathless piece. Because there are less rosters your size to match with, you're being matched with these opponents. You're in silver 2 so you weren't really affected by the seeding bug.
1. Get destroyed by bigger account & complain
2. Complete the story quest push further .grind
Arena buy anything offers to make the next
progressive title.
Even paragon are complaining they are matching valiant . I am valiant I am facing min 6- r3 7* with onslaught ,serpant max as 6*
Kabam put those carrots in a stick in Diamond and Vibranium and now every UC and Cav think they are entitled to the reward.
1. Looks for similar rated rosters in your tier.
2. Looks for anyone in your tier if it can't find the first.
You're in a competition. You can't have the easy path and expect the same rewards if others are have a harder path. This is typically how BGs has been for many seasons now. It will be worse because of the deathless piece. You all just need to accept it.
To take the first option😂 (also got any god tips about act 6.1.1)
You obviously didn't learn your lessons.
Celebrate bad times come on 🕺🕺🕺
But my gold it's not getting gud 😂😓😢
Some people think "fair" is when we look for and find someone they can beat and only match them against those people. However, for the competition as a whole that is incredibly unfair, because it means weak players get to progress faster than stronger players, and stronger players are punished for being stronger players by being forced to compete against much stronger competition. Most competitive players, and the devs themselves, do not believe this is fair.
Here's the acid test for fairness. When you match the way you describe, we know what happens because the devs did it in the past, and until recently did it for lower VT tiers. Take any strong player and have them play two different rosters. First, their normal very strong roster. Then have then step down and play a much weaker roster. If they have a second account, this is an experiment you can do. This player will essentially *always* promote faster with the weak account than the strong account, all other things kept equal. And that's because the competition is weaker in lower roster strength groups. People say UC vs UC is the same as Val vs Val. Its not. When I play my Val account against other Val accounts the experience is completely different than when I play a Cav account against other Cav accounts. It is undeniably easier playing the Cav account against other Cav accounts. So the Vals are being punished when Vals match against all other Vals and UCs match against all other UCs.
That's unfair, no matter how fair some people think equal roster matching is. It simply isn't because it punishes players for advancing their rosters. And in a game that is all about advancing roster, that is a ludicrous situation to place in a competitive game mode.
Reread DNA's post right above this. You just became TB and you're matched with TBs that are moments away from becoming Paragon. I'm kind of thinking if you had a good sized losing streak, you'd complain about something not being fair.
It sucks losing. I get it. It does and I understand how you feel. But in a PvP setting there is one winner and one loser. You can't win every match.