BG match suspicious

DarkNightRise

Can anyone explain this match details. It looks so weird

Giantwalrus56

54 seconds for a 7* punching down on a 6* doesn't seem weird to me

Nemesis_17

1514% of damage taken was from poison? Ayo wth

Wolf911

not suspicious at all

that 1514% poison damage is from poison stings

he threw special while indestructible so he didn't get any damage still it shows ( same way it shows recoil damage as well )

and 54 seconds is slow it can be done in like 45 seconds

DarkNightRise

Nemesis_17 said:

1514% of damage taken was from poison? Ayo wth

This is what I’m confusing now, how can poison damage that big!!! And he is still remain 100% health

DarkNightRise

Giantwalrus56 said:

54 seconds for a 7* punching down on a 6* doesn't seem weird to me

That’s a 7r2 fight with my 6r5 acsended. Should be equal fight

JLordVileJ

DarkNightRise said:

Nemesis_17 said:

1514% of damage taken was from poison? Ayo wth

This is what I’m confusing now, how can poison damage that big!!! And he is still remain 100% health

Person above you answered you

DarkNightRise

Wolf911 said:

not suspicious at all

that 1514% poison damage is from poison stings

he threw special while indestructible so he didn't get any damage still it shows ( same way it shows recoil damage as well )

and 54 seconds is slow it can be done in like 45 seconds

But what is 1514% damage??? Is there something wrong with this number? And I know Titania can throw special when she’s indestructible so she didn’t take any power sting damage! But how can she end up 100% health meanwhile she’s not poison immune

SummonerNR

Something, something …
Damage was dealt, but she did not actually take the damage.

Also could maybe factor in Willpower, recovering health from poison debuffs (if they were still applied) that weren’t actually hurting her ?

The higher than 100% may be due to that “damage dealt”, divided by actual damage taken (which was much lower).

JLordVileJ

Okay I think its time to get @DNA3000 in her

Masquirade

This is pretty cool in a really nerdy way.

I wonder if there's a damage calculation while indestructible that trips up the numbers? If a negative value is divided by another negative value, the outcome is positive, so perhaps the damage numbers in the calculation actually get multiplied before they are cancelled by the indestructible? Just spitballing.

JLordVileJ

Masquirade said:

This is pretty cool in a really nerdy way.

I wonder if there's a damage calculation while indestructible that trips up the numbers? If a negative value is divided by another negative value, the outcome is positive, so perhaps the damage numbers in the calculation actually get multiplied before they are cancelled by the indestructible? Just spitballing.

Sounds about right. Would've thought the devs would have thought of this but who knows. But either way none of this would affect actual damage as indestructible vetoes all of that so maybe they thought it unimportant

Masquirade

JLordVileJ said:

Masquirade said:

This is pretty cool in a really nerdy way.

I wonder if there's a damage calculation while indestructible that trips up the numbers? If a negative value is divided by another negative value, the outcome is positive, so perhaps the damage numbers in the calculation actually get multiplied before they are cancelled by the indestructible? Just spitballing.

Sounds about right. Would've thought the devs would have thought of this but who knows. But either way none of this would affect actual damage as indestructible vetoes all of that so maybe they thought it unimportant

Yeah exactly that, the deciding factor at the end of the day is "Damage = 0" but the formula for how you get to zero might be set up differently for different damage types 👍

DNA3000

JLordVileJ said:

Masquirade said:

This is pretty cool in a really nerdy way.

I wonder if there's a damage calculation while indestructible that trips up the numbers? If a negative value is divided by another negative value, the outcome is positive, so perhaps the damage numbers in the calculation actually get multiplied before they are cancelled by the indestructible? Just spitballing.

Sounds about right. Would've thought the devs would have thought of this but who knows. But either way none of this would affect actual damage as indestructible vetoes all of that so maybe they thought it unimportant

Because of the complexity of damage effects, it can be non-trivial for the damage calculations to determine precisely how much damage was generated, how much was actually dealt, and so on. Early on the devs discovered that these calculations were not always displaying correctly, so they decided to take them down until they could figure out how to make them accurate. However, the players complained that they wanted those numbers, because even if they were not always 100% accurate they were highly informative, both for analyzing fights and for looking for potential cheaters. So the devs brough the numbers back, but with the caveat that they might not always be accurate because they had no way to ensure that they would always reflect what the players assumed they reflected, and even numbers that were calculated correctly in the past might break in the future as they continue to change things under the hood.