Blade or Starlord???

ShakyzShakyz Member Posts: 7
in General Discussion
Which one deserves 5/65??
«13

Comments

  • The_OneThe_One Member Posts: 2,936 ★★★★
    SL doesn't benefit mush from it
  • ShakyzShakyz Member Posts: 7
    İ ve both of them 4/55 and i havent finished lol yet tats why ask it
  • ljainD5ljainD5 Member Posts: 41
    Blade is definitely a better option.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,106 ★★★★★
    Shakyz wrote: »
    İ ve both of them 4/55 and i havent finished lol yet tats why ask it

    blade is better for lol, as well as every other part of the game
  • Deadbyrd9Deadbyrd9 Member Posts: 3,469 ★★★★
    Blade, No reason to rank sl to rank 5. It’s not needed
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Romario26Romario26 Member Posts: 97
    SL to R5 would be cheaper if you’re good at the game, if you’re great at the game keep SL at R4. SL only benefits at using less synergy at R5 and less hits. Blade is for less skilled players that can’t keep combo, it’ll be like 1400 hits to take down a 3.3mil champ though
    But all round blade would be a better choice cause war blade is better
  • LoPrestiLoPresti Member Posts: 1,035 ★★★
    edited January 2018
    SL does not gain much from being r5. Unless you grind LOL for fun every day, go with Blade.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,106 ★★★★★
    Romario26 wrote: »
    SL to R5 would be cheaper if you’re good at the game, if you’re great at the game keep SL at R4. SL only benefits at using less synergy at R5 and less hits. Blade is for less skilled players that can’t keep combo, it’ll be like 1400 hits to take down a 3.3mil champ though
    But all round blade would be a better choice cause war blade is better

    Just cause it takes less hits doesn't mean it's cheaper. Blade is cheaper for LOL if you're good or bad, it doesn't matter
  • KestrelleKestrelle Member Posts: 441 ★★
    Bahamut wrote: »
    SL. I don’t care about what Kabam says I know they’re going to nerf Blade. “But wait” you say “they said that they don’t plan on changing him”. Yeah well they said the same thing about Thor DS and SW and we all know how that turned out...

    Seriously, your bars just came off and your already violating forum rules. Just wow.

    They've answered this enough. Until they actually go against everything they've repeatedly told us, leave it be
  • xNigxNig Member Posts: 7,336 ★★★★★
    danielmath wrote: »
    Romario26 wrote: »
    SL to R5 would be cheaper if you’re good at the game, if you’re great at the game keep SL at R4. SL only benefits at using less synergy at R5 and less hits. Blade is for less skilled players that can’t keep combo, it’ll be like 1400 hits to take down a 3.3mil champ though
    But all round blade would be a better choice cause war blade is better

    Just cause it takes less hits doesn't mean it's cheaper. Blade is cheaper for LOL if you're good or bad, it doesn't matter

    Which is a big problem, no? Lol
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,106 ★★★★★
    xNig wrote: »
    danielmath wrote: »
    Romario26 wrote: »
    SL to R5 would be cheaper if you’re good at the game, if you’re great at the game keep SL at R4. SL only benefits at using less synergy at R5 and less hits. Blade is for less skilled players that can’t keep combo, it’ll be like 1400 hits to take down a 3.3mil champ though
    But all round blade would be a better choice cause war blade is better

    Just cause it takes less hits doesn't mean it's cheaper. Blade is cheaper for LOL if you're good or bad, it doesn't matter

    Which is a big problem, no? Lol

    Any regen champ is going to be cheaper, not just blade. I'd have saved like 10k units if i rank my 4/55 morningstar instead of SL for the 5 paths i ran with SL.
  • xNigxNig Member Posts: 7,336 ★★★★★
    danielmath wrote: »
    xNig wrote: »
    danielmath wrote: »
    Romario26 wrote: »
    SL to R5 would be cheaper if you’re good at the game, if you’re great at the game keep SL at R4. SL only benefits at using less synergy at R5 and less hits. Blade is for less skilled players that can’t keep combo, it’ll be like 1400 hits to take down a 3.3mil champ though
    But all round blade would be a better choice cause war blade is better

    Just cause it takes less hits doesn't mean it's cheaper. Blade is cheaper for LOL if you're good or bad, it doesn't matter

    Which is a big problem, no? Lol

    Any regen champ is going to be cheaper, not just blade. I'd have saved like 10k units if i rank my 4/55 morningstar instead of SL for the 5 paths i ran with SL.

    Just that you won’t be able to match SL’s damage output with Morningstar, which translates to longer fights, which means fatigue tends to set in and more chances of getting Kabam evaded and comboed to oblivion. I think I would have spent 10k units more if I ran with Morningstar instead of SL for the 7 paths I did half a year ago.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,106 ★★★★★
    xNig wrote: »
    danielmath wrote: »
    xNig wrote: »
    danielmath wrote: »
    Romario26 wrote: »
    SL to R5 would be cheaper if you’re good at the game, if you’re great at the game keep SL at R4. SL only benefits at using less synergy at R5 and less hits. Blade is for less skilled players that can’t keep combo, it’ll be like 1400 hits to take down a 3.3mil champ though
    But all round blade would be a better choice cause war blade is better

    Just cause it takes less hits doesn't mean it's cheaper. Blade is cheaper for LOL if you're good or bad, it doesn't matter

    Which is a big problem, no? Lol

    Any regen champ is going to be cheaper, not just blade. I'd have saved like 10k units if i rank my 4/55 morningstar instead of SL for the 5 paths i ran with SL.

    Just that you won’t be able to match SL’s damage output with Morningstar, which translates to longer fights, which means fatigue tends to set in and more chances of getting Kabam evaded and comboed to oblivion. I think I would have spent 10k units more if I ran with Morningstar instead of SL for the 7 paths I did half a year ago.

    i mean....i did a path with her and it was the cheapest path i did (by a decent margin), sure it takes longer but being at full health you don't die from an evade or lose your combo
  • xNigxNig Member Posts: 7,336 ★★★★★
    It really depends on which path was taken. Despite all being inner paths, their difficulties vary by quite abit.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,106 ★★★★★
    xNig wrote: »
    It really depends on which path was taken. Despite all being inner paths, their difficulties vary by quite abit.

    She wrecked venompool, widow, strange, while SL was a nightmare against VP (for me at least). She's still better then SL for most fights (of course there's a few exceptions). I still would've saved thousands of units if had her for all my paths.
  • RektorRektor Member Posts: 678 ★★★
    SL’s gonna get nerfed so I’d say no to him.

    Any champ whose answer is “strong enough at r4 to clear everything. Don’t need to r5” and already got nerfed and already got a node made just for him in the hardest content is on the chopping block.

    Rank blade. He won’t be getting adjusted any time soon, if ever.
  • KestrelleKestrelle Member Posts: 441 ★★
    Rektor wrote: »
    SL’s gonna get nerfed so I’d say no to him.

    Any champ whose answer is “strong enough at r4 to clear everything. Don’t need to r5” and already got nerfed and already got a node made just for him in the hardest content is on the chopping block.

    Rank blade. He won’t be getting adjusted any time soon, if ever.

    Source for SL getting nerfed (as in verifiable quote from kabam employee)?
  • Vision_41Vision_41 Member Posts: 721 ★
    Blade!
  • RektorRektor Member Posts: 678 ★★★
    edited January 2018
    Kestrelle wrote: »
    Rektor wrote: »
    SL’s gonna get nerfed so I’d say no to him.

    Any champ whose answer is “strong enough at r4 to clear everything. Don’t need to r5” and already got nerfed and already got a node made just for him in the hardest content is on the chopping block.

    Rank blade. He won’t be getting adjusted any time soon, if ever.

    Source for SL getting nerfed (as in verifiable quote from kabam employee)?

    Find it yourself, if you can. You know, like your buddy did last time you attempted to call me out


  • KestrelleKestrelle Member Posts: 441 ★★
    My buddy? Who the heck is that? Fairly sure I don't have any buddies here
  • RektorRektor Member Posts: 678 ★★★
    Anyway, OP, like I said before being harassed, any champ whose answer is “strong enough at r4 to clear everything. Don’t need to r5” and already got nerfed and already got a node made just for him in the hardest content is on the chopping block.

    Rank blade and don’t look back. He’s the wiser choice.

  • KestrelleKestrelle Member Posts: 441 ★★
    edited January 2018
    Actually, it was you who did the harassing. I asked a legitimate question. I genuinely want to know the source

    Though I do agree, go with blade
  • Romario26Romario26 Member Posts: 97
    danielmath wrote: »
    Romario26 wrote: »
    SL to R5 would be cheaper if you’re good at the game, if you’re great at the game keep SL at R4. SL only benefits at using less synergy at R5 and less hits. Blade is for less skilled players that can’t keep combo, it’ll be like 1400 hits to take down a 3.3mil champ though
    But all round blade would be a better choice cause war blade is better

    Just cause it takes less hits doesn't mean it's cheaper. Blade is cheaper for LOL if you're good or bad, it doesn't matter

    Less hits means less time, time spent doing something else worth something. Hence why I said cheaper, just think before you start having your verbal diarrhea.
Sign In or Register to comment.