ContestOfNoobs wrote: » sounds like u have a weak roster i
NastyEfnNate wrote: » Nah the 7500 5* shards over the month are a freakin joke. What was kabam thinking in giving something like this for very little effort. Shame on kabam
BitterSteel wrote: » NastyEfnNate wrote: » Nah the 7500 5* shards over the month are a freakin joke. What was kabam thinking in giving something like this for very little effort. Shame on kabam In what world is a month 15 days?
Boboman wrote: » ContestOfNoobs wrote: » sounds like u have a weak roster i Wise words
GroundedWisdom wrote: » The Energy is not the issue. These subjects always inevitably lead to people saying it's a matter of skill. It's about the level of effort needed in proportion to the Quest everyday. Some can glide through it. Great. That doesn't mean the concerns of others aren't valid. The majority of people can do it with enough effort and/or Resources. That doesn't mean it's in proportion to a Daily Quest. There is a point where the level of challenge is too much, and the cumulative Rewards are irrelevant if it's not worth the amount of effort it takes everyday. This is not EQ where someone can take their time. This is a daily, time-sensitive Event that requires constant Completion for the cumulative Rewards. I've already voiced my concern in the main Thread, but it becomes redundant to see the same rebuttals when people are trying to give their feedback. Obviously people don't have to do it. Obviously people can do the level below. Obviously some don't have an issue. The point is it requires a great deal of effort everyday.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » It doesn't require a great deal of effort for you. That doesn't mean that applies to others, and let's face it, the number of people who have commented on the same issue is larger than the number of people who say it's not an issue. The point I'm making is just because you don't have an issue with it doesn't mean it's not an issue.
Arus25 wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » It doesn't require a great deal of effort for you. That doesn't mean that applies to others, and let's face it, the number of people who have commented on the same issue is larger than the number of people who say it's not an issue. The point I'm making is just because you don't have an issue with it doesn't mean it's not an issue. If you saying ppl dont have an issue does not mean it not an issue Same words back to you If you have issue does not mean it is an issue
LeNoirFaineant wrote: » Kind of funny though. This is the first time I've ever seen @GroundedWisdom not defend whatever it is Kabam is doing and I still disagree lmao.