Q for the Devs: why Stark's prestige lower than Blade?
Karinshi
Member Posts: 280 ★★
even though Starks needs much higher skill level to master?
the trend used to be either high prestige+ mediocre champ (e.g. Phoenix) or mediocre prestige + strong champ (e.g. Wolverine)
what have changed?
btw, I'm not asking for a nerf, just want to know what was the reason behind this phenomenal that caused leaderboard to has so many Blades as a profile pic!
P.S.: this is the main reason why every single day we see a post talking about Blade nerf
the trend used to be either high prestige+ mediocre champ (e.g. Phoenix) or mediocre prestige + strong champ (e.g. Wolverine)
what have changed?
btw, I'm not asking for a nerf, just want to know what was the reason behind this phenomenal that caused leaderboard to has so many Blades as a profile pic!
P.S.: this is the main reason why every single day we see a post talking about Blade nerf
-3
Comments
As for Blade being easier to use than SS... that's really dependent on the opponent. SS has many matchups and or nodes I would far prefer to bring him over Blade.
oh hi there Ultima,
for the question, probably this is the exact reason (which was a fetal mistake IMHO) and not only for Stark vs Blade , but for Blade vs All
And as for mastering the champ, what I meant was : to play with low risk to die, for example:
for Stark > one failed evade = 50-100% of your HP is gone (and his auto evade some times cause you to get killed if it happened while trying to build poise charges )
for Blade > you don't have to worry about blocked hit (or even direct hit) because you can heal back (most) of it
we can only hope for the best