Idea: attacker diversity rating
Argygufdetlop
Member Posts: 62 ★
We just lost a very close war, where each BG appears to consist of one guy who had purchased 10 accounts, nearly all of which brought r5blade/GR/spark as war attackers. This is the famous “trinity team” that your data must be showing you is dominant in alliance war attack.
Put simply, this specific team is too good. Yet I appreciate you can’t nerf blade because it would cause an outcry among all those people who invested so much to get him.
When a few defenders were dominating alliance war defense, you introduced defender diversity rating, which fixed the problem. I humbly suggest introducing attacker diversity rating next season as a way to soft nerf blade without changing him. It would fix the problem and, as an added bonus, poke a stick in the eye of people who spend thousands on multiple trinity team accounts.
Put simply, this specific team is too good. Yet I appreciate you can’t nerf blade because it would cause an outcry among all those people who invested so much to get him.
When a few defenders were dominating alliance war defense, you introduced defender diversity rating, which fixed the problem. I humbly suggest introducing attacker diversity rating next season as a way to soft nerf blade without changing him. It would fix the problem and, as an added bonus, poke a stick in the eye of people who spend thousands on multiple trinity team accounts.
3