Demonzfyre wrote: » Hes better duped
BitterSteel wrote: » Demonzfyre wrote: » Hes better duped As a champ that when you use he has debuffs on his opponent 95%+ of the time, his sig is rather irrelevant when it’s slightly increased power gain and crit rating when the opponent has NO debuffs on them. It’d be like if blade’s signature was increased attack while the opponent is not bleeding, alright, but not needed at all. Massacre is great because he doesn’t need to be duped, and his sig doesn’t add very much to him.
Demonzfyre wrote: » BitterSteel wrote: » Demonzfyre wrote: » Hes better duped As a champ that when you use he has debuffs on his opponent 95%+ of the time, his sig is rather irrelevant when it’s slightly increased power gain and crit rating when the opponent has NO debuffs on them. It’d be like if blade’s signature was increased attack while the opponent is not bleeding, alright, but not needed at all. Massacre is great because he doesn’t need to be duped, and his sig doesn’t add very much to him. Makes sense. I dont have him but I was going off what my alliance mates were saying and what I read. So hes like a Skill version of Angela.
Demonzfyre wrote: » Makes sense. I dont have him but I was going off what my alliance mates were saying and what I read. So hes like a Skill version of Angela.
Mitchell35 wrote: » BitterSteel wrote: » Demonzfyre wrote: » Hes better duped As a champ that when you use he has debuffs on his opponent 95%+ of the time, his sig is rather irrelevant when it’s slightly increased power gain and crit rating when the opponent has NO debuffs on them. It’d be like if blade’s signature was increased attack while the opponent is not bleeding, alright, but not needed at all. Massacre is great because he doesn’t need to be duped, and his sig doesn’t add very much to him. Attack MLLL into block parry and repeat until bat is lighted then tempo attack to incinerate + spam special 1 Agree with above quote, this is just the strategy