taojay1 wrote: » Depends on how many sig stones you have, honestly. Here's why I chose sw instead of blade: 1. sparky is not worth a generic gem, sig is useful for sure but definitely not necessary. 2. sw is only available as a 4 star, makes her worth investing in compared to 4* blade, who has a 5 star version. 3. maybe this is personal preference, but when i was completing act 5, i had sw but not blade. Sw was probably my default champ for most fights, good combo of damage output/nuillification/sporadic, powerful regen/power control. Tbh when it comes down to sw vs blade it's just personal preference, both are worth it. If you don't have a lot of sig stones definitely do blade.
Monasou wrote: » blade will give the best results at a low sig level. SW really needs to get up to 60-70 before she really takes off.
Captain_2good wrote: » taojay1 wrote: » Depends on how many sig stones you have, honestly. Here's why I chose sw instead of blade: 1. sparky is not worth a generic gem, sig is useful for sure but definitely not necessary. 2. sw is only available as a 4 star, makes her worth investing in compared to 4* blade, who has a 5 star version. 3. maybe this is personal preference, but when i was completing act 5, i had sw but not blade. Sw was probably my default champ for most fights, good combo of damage output/nuillification/sporadic, powerful regen/power control. Tbh when it comes down to sw vs blade it's just personal preference, both are worth it. If you don't have a lot of sig stones definitely do blade. Monasou wrote: » blade will give the best results at a low sig level. SW really needs to get up to 60-70 before she really takes off. Sig stone wise I only have just over 20 of each class.