**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.

Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.

What should the game do when two alliances tie in alliance war

What should the game do when two alliances tie in alliance war

What should the game do when two alliances tie in alliance war 72 votes

Split the winning bonus 50/50
58%
ArcDeAngelusRektorSiliyoLeNoirFaineantMagicBentonDoc_HollamonDrenlinzuffyTerrakpkumardtsAlCapone2727Lvernon15Pwf57exc3lCodornasNojokejaymSandeepSissamaf80Flash_GordonTatteredSail 42 votes
Award both alliances a war victor crystal with a 50% chance for 50k points
4%
RazorDevilDOKTOROKTOPUSJohnHS 3 votes
MVPs duel in sudden death overtime
11%
LibralonixTaZ_4178PrathapYellowpenguin04Denzel116EtjamaMasterChief1176Aryl 8 votes
Match them again in a double or nothing war
12%
MrTicTac19992008Liss_Bliss_LordRaymond3B_Dizzle_01Amazing_Demon05Beyond00_UmbertoDelRioPkarli412TheInfinty 9 votes
Receive new title: "The only winning move is not to play"
13%
World Eaterob1spykerDemonzfyreDarthPhalGrootman1294cookiedealerJollyHawkToo_qikEdeuinkRoninMan 10 votes

Comments

  • RoninManRoninMan Posts: 747 ★★★★
    Receive new title: "The only winning move is not to play"
    Although I like the title “Can’t Win For Trying” better.
  • Lvernon15Lvernon15 Posts: 11,596 ★★★★★
    Split the winning bonus 50/50
    It’s the kind of way draws work everywhere else, sports and other games, you get some points but not as many as if you had won
  • LeNoirFaineantLeNoirFaineant Posts: 8,638 ★★★★★
    Split the winning bonus 50/50
    A tie is better than a loss. War rating stays the same and 1/2 bonus to each.
  • Hammerbro_64Hammerbro_64 Posts: 7,463 ★★★★★
    Add defender diversity as a tiebreaker, but this time it counts for all wars ever taken place, and different star levels count for different defenders
  • PrathapPrathap Posts: 581 ★★★
    MVPs duel in sudden death overtime
    War should have "A" winner
  • CainCain Posts: 559 ★★
    Least item use wins
  • Hammerbro_64Hammerbro_64 Posts: 7,463 ★★★★★
    Alternatively, they could calculate the total lifetime of all of the accounts participating in war and whichever one is overall younger will get +1 point (Giving players who get better faster a reward)

    It would need to be adjusted for outliers though so people don’t make second accounts and grind the living daylight to get them to worthy of placing a defense.
  • DarthPhalDarthPhal Posts: 1,064 ★★★★
    Receive new title: "The only winning move is not to play"

  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Posts: 20,861 ★★★★★
    Receive new title: "The only winning move is not to play"
    Whoever has the least amount of Dominos and Things on defense wins.
  • cookiedealercookiedealer Posts: 260 ★★
    edited October 2019
    Receive new title: "The only winning move is not to play"
    Wasn't the ties = no win to prevent AW matchmaking collusion? The idea of colluding to stay at whatever rank that master alliance is at?

    I'm all for ties giving points at lower tier, but not master, so plat 1 people have a fighting chance to place master.
  • SnizzbarSnizzbar Posts: 2,142 ★★★★★
    Both should lose.
  • ArylAryl Posts: 1,302 ★★★★
    MVPs duel in sudden death overtime
    The only real solution.
  • LeNoirFaineantLeNoirFaineant Posts: 8,638 ★★★★★
    edited October 2019
    Split the winning bonus 50/50
    Snizzbar said:

    Both should lose.

    Why? Why should a tie be the same as a loss? It's not the same as a loss pretty much anywhere else. Is winning by 100 points really so much better that the result should be so much different?
  • SnizzbarSnizzbar Posts: 2,142 ★★★★★

    Snizzbar said:

    Both should lose.

    Why? Why should a tie be the same as a loss? It's not the same as a loss pretty much anywhere else. Is winning by 100 points really so much better that the result should be so much different?
    Just my opinion man. Don't want to get into a discussion on it.
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Posts: 18,552 Guardian

    Whoever has the least amount of Dominos and Things on defense wins.

    "Dominos and Things" sounds like dorm food party.
  • LeNoirFaineantLeNoirFaineant Posts: 8,638 ★★★★★
    Split the winning bonus 50/50
    Snizzbar said:

    Snizzbar said:

    Both should lose.

    Why? Why should a tie be the same as a loss? It's not the same as a loss pretty much anywhere else. Is winning by 100 points really so much better that the result should be so much different?
    Just my opinion man. Don't want to get into a discussion on it.
    Fair enough
Sign In or Register to comment.