**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
AW Season 13: the overlooked players
Octoberstack
Posts: 872 ★★★★
Although they exist in the minority, there are still many players who are being excluded from AW season rewards through no fault of their own.
These players joined a new alliance with enough time to complete 5 wars (which would have made them eligible for season rewards), but were left unable to participate in a single war due to the recurring enlistment bug.
As stated by Kabam, you are only able to claim the ‘early’ season rewards if you have taken part in at least one war with your current alliance. Consequently these players will be losing out on season rewards completely, despite only being victims of bugs and unlucky timing.
Are these players just going to get the short end of the stick without any acknowledgement at all from the Kabam team?
I understand that it would be impossible to differentiate between new alliance members who (in a bug-free world) would have gone on to complete 5 wars, and those who would not have. However, I do feel that such a wide-reaching problem with such an integral part of the game should warrant an equally wide-reaching solution, one that is as inclusive as possible, even if that means “overcompensating”.
I know some of you will disagree with this - that’s completely fine. I just wanted to express the views of a seemingly overlooked portion of the playerbase, and would appreciate a response or even just a simple acknowledgement from the Kabam team regarding these players and their current predicament. Thank you.
These players joined a new alliance with enough time to complete 5 wars (which would have made them eligible for season rewards), but were left unable to participate in a single war due to the recurring enlistment bug.
As stated by Kabam, you are only able to claim the ‘early’ season rewards if you have taken part in at least one war with your current alliance. Consequently these players will be losing out on season rewards completely, despite only being victims of bugs and unlucky timing.
Are these players just going to get the short end of the stick without any acknowledgement at all from the Kabam team?
I understand that it would be impossible to differentiate between new alliance members who (in a bug-free world) would have gone on to complete 5 wars, and those who would not have. However, I do feel that such a wide-reaching problem with such an integral part of the game should warrant an equally wide-reaching solution, one that is as inclusive as possible, even if that means “overcompensating”.
I know some of you will disagree with this - that’s completely fine. I just wanted to express the views of a seemingly overlooked portion of the playerbase, and would appreciate a response or even just a simple acknowledgement from the Kabam team regarding these players and their current predicament. Thank you.
26
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Needs sorting as it’s not his fault.
Even some of our group had to leave alliance mid of the war ..Then only we decided to do this thing from next time onwards
For example, some people change from a 6x5 AQ alliance to a more casual Map 3 one due to their work schedules getting busier - that way, they’re not compromising their former alliance’s chances of successfully completing AQ by giving them the chance to recruit a more active player.
1) They had to join before war 8 started, as joining between war 8 and 9 would not have granted you 5 total wars.
2) You could not join between war 7 and 8 because of the downtime, once the servers came back up enslistment started, and the issues of down time started at the end of war 7.
3) this means the people who could legit claim this are people who joined during an active war, so the alliance had to have not been in that war or lost members during the war, both of which is very small.
Really?