**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Wasp NERF rank down tickets required
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
That makes the fact that he doesn’t fact check all the information even more of a joke.
The fact that he actually has a following is still beyond me.
Its right there in the bugs forum. Under known issues.
I’m not that much of a Kabam fan, so if I’m saying so, it’s saying something. Trust me, this isn’t a nurf, it’s a bug. (A bug in our favor but still a bug)
This also brings into question how passive incinerate works...doesn't it? Can and should an incinerate "immune" champ take incinerate damage from a "passive" incinerate if the company is now stating that a stun "immune" defender may not be "passively" stunned?
If I'm missing something, please do educate. Thanks.
I don’t se what’s wrong here. He is working as intended