**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.

Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.

War 15.0 win without defenders..

Jac094Jac094 Posts: 198
edited September 2017 in General Discussion
So, here is your nice new and totally skilled
War system, Kabam.
etcabvd6kwe0.jpg

Comments

  • MEKA5MEKA5 Posts: 344 ★★
    EPIC FAIL @Kabam
  • Run477Run477 Posts: 1,391 ★★★
    c1dsjnl1ujse.png
    No. That's why you lost
  • MadMarksMadMarks Posts: 155
    They have to double the value of a boss.
  • Rednick69Rednick69 Posts: 325
    MadMarks wrote: »
    They have to double the value of a boss.

    There was no boss to kill.
  • Jac094Jac094 Posts: 198
    Run477 wrote: »
    c1dsjnl1ujse.png
    No. That's why you lost
    Actually, sx lost, dx win ._.

  • Run477Run477 Posts: 1,391 ★★★
    Jac094 wrote: »
    Run477 wrote: »
    c1dsjnl1ujse.png
    No. That's why you lost
    Actually, sx lost, dx win ._.

    So you are just recycling the screen shot that has been uploaded repeatedly already? I personally hope the alliance we face tries the zero defender approach. Easy win and then they will complain on here that it didn't work for them.
  • Rednick69Rednick69 Posts: 325
    Run477 wrote: »
    Jac094 wrote: »
    Run477 wrote: »
    c1dsjnl1ujse.png
    No. That's why you lost
    Actually, sx lost, dx win ._.

    So you are just recycling the screen shot that has been uploaded repeatedly already? I personally hope the alliance we face tries the zero defender approach. Easy win and then they will complain on here that it didn't work for them.

    If they 100% clear you will lose.
  • JRock808JRock808 Posts: 1,149 ★★★★
    You have to use an exploit to beat the exploit. Thanks Kabam!
  • Run477Run477 Posts: 1,391 ★★★
    Rednick69 wrote: »
    Run477 wrote: »
    Jac094 wrote: »
    Run477 wrote: »
    c1dsjnl1ujse.png
    No. That's why you lost
    Actually, sx lost, dx win ._.

    So you are just recycling the screen shot that has been uploaded repeatedly already? I personally hope the alliance we face tries the zero defender approach. Easy win and then they will complain on here that it didn't work for them.

    If they 100% clear you will lose.

    False. It's simple math. It is a guaranteed win if you understand how the scoring works.

    I personally would rather have the old system (minus thorns, power start 1 with all or nothing, slashed tires, and maybe the degen tiles). And drop the diversity rating. Then people can put in real defenses and war goes back to being fun without the stupid guaranteed damage that can't be played around with skill.
  • HoidCosmereHoidCosmere Posts: 550 ★★
    This is kinda funny and kinda sad. So after this past war and I could figure out the exact points for everything, I gave my 10 year old the scoring system and asked him to figure out if this scoring system was fair. In 10 minutes he came back to me with, "no dad it isn't, a team who refuses to defend itself has the advantage in this every time."

    So, they didn't even need a beta test to know there is a problem with the scoring system, just needed a 10 year old with a calculator.
Sign In or Register to comment.