**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Matchmaking Discussion [Merged Threads]
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
No. I mean what I said. I have zero issue with any ally reaching the highest tier available despite size. I do have an issue with a system that allows allys to bypass other allys by not having to engage them on their way to a higher tier.
You keep harping on fairness but completely ignore fairness for an entirely different set of players. Why is one group MORE deserving of fairness?
The current system (1 set of rewards) will never be fair. There are simply varying degrees of fairness. Under the current setup, the fairest method to distribute 1 set of rewards means everyone SHOULD at the very least have the capability to face ANYONE. The previous arrangement of match making did not allow certain matchups to occur. That was further on the injustice scale than the new matchmaking.
A 1.5-2k difference in prestige could still be competitive.
There would be hundreds of 20-25mil alliances, 7-8k prestige with less rating that would destroy you in war, yet oh never face them.
Two can play that game.
But the matchmaking seems solid.
I don't get the complaints tbh. Some pretty contradictory ideas from the ppl against the new matchmaking. Claiming they fought hard and meritted their high rewards... but crying now coz they are facing stronger allis.
Well, which one is it? Were you or were you not holding your own in plat / G1? Lol Coz if you were in your well deserved spot - playing against other well deserving allis... then you should have no trouble getting and staying there again. And you really mean that the ppl double your size were well deserving of ranking two / three brackets lower than your...
Sheesh. It doesn't compute, sorry lol
Candy shop is closed, kids. Time to get some schooling
How does this happen? How on earth does my alliance with 8.2k prestige match up against one with 2k prestige. Kabam plz fix this it is absurd