**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Comments
Rewards just need to be buffed by 50% (minimum acceptable) to 100% (where the game actually should be atm imo). As is, it’s just out of touch, which is okay-they’ve shown they can adjust when we speak up.
I mean, at this point Kabam probably figures we’ll complain no matter what they do (which I can’t blame them), so they start low and have room to increase to what they actually want it to be.
If that’s not the case... they promised to be better moving forward when the roadmap had to be made. Let’s make it more than a couple months before that promise is broken, please, Kabam.
And putting the rarest item in contest behind 4*s which no one wants to invest there resources in.
Its just terrible when we are forced to rank champs because of a temporary content.
Variant etc i understand its permanent we can rank up whenever we want and complete that content
But
When it comes to temporary events. Its just bad. Now everyone will be forced to rank up 4* variations of champs that are good counter to cavalier bosses.
Just add that 10% t5cc to exploration rewards too. Or come up with Any other challenge that doesn't force us to rank up 4* champs( useless nowdays)
Thank you
In other words, a position that can't defend itself on the forums is unlikely to be considered interesting by the devs. Nor should they be. Anyone who believes their position is something the devs should read should welcome opposition posts. Because good ideas only look good when they overcome opposing viewpoints successfully. If no one questions or challenges them at all, that's generally a mark of a boring idea.
I should also point out that when opposing viewpoints are presented on the forums, the one the devs think is better isn't always the one that the majority of forum posters support. Just like each and every one of us, the devs judge winners and losers in the marketplace of ideas on their own, and likes and disagrees have nothing to do with it. So if you genuinely believe someone is attacking your ideas unfairly, and you believe a neutral observer would agree, then those attacks should be irrelevant to you, as the devs will similarly ignore them. I know for a fact that the devs make the same judgments we do on that score also.
The problems the devs face is which player do they want to convince they are doing their job correctly.
It all boils down to what you can cumulatively get through the month though. Top AQ/AW players are already getting around 3/4 of a t5c per month. This takes that to around a full one. Players lower in rankings of those modes will be getting substantially less but that's how it's always been. They're not about to just start handing t5c out like candy especially when the vast majority of players have barely scratched let alone finished Act 6 and/or Abyss.
Like You did for first uncollected event
I’m fine with opposing viewpoints. Simply complaining about others who took the time to post their viewpoints is just trolling. If you can’t see the difference, you really shouldn’t be grandstanding about what should and should not be happening on the forums.
My opinion is the rewards aren’t good enough. I didn’t search out posts that liked the rewards and attempt to derail the thread or complain about their opinion or try to get personal. That’s not what the forums are for, I’m sorry you disagree and feel that behaviour should be allowed. If he had said “I disagree with you because _______....it’s then a discussion on a forum.
PS - you are never in a position to determine what is or is not irrelevant to someone else.
That isn’t the case. I’m constantly lacking t2a and try to grab every fragment i can.