**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Comments
@Kabam Miike care to comment?
All they've done if set out another RNG dependent factor to roadblock progression. Kabams reliance on RNG isn't something that came out of the blue
Does the 6* basic pool suck and offer extremely low chance of pulling champions worthy of r3? Absolutely. I’m hoping Kabam will really start cranking out the champion updates faster and make it much less tiresome to pull a champion worth r3 which I think will help alleviate some of the complaints that people have with this method of measuring player progression.
I also want to point out that simply adding a progression milestone that a player could simply unit through (such as 100% abyss, or 100% act 6) will just delay the same problem. Ultimately a players progression shouldn’t only be determined by what content they have completed but also by the depth of their roster. This will help prevent players from simply uniting (is that a verb now ) their way through content and getting rewards that are way beyond their progression.
Ultimately I think the throne-breaker milestone does this, which in my opinion, is a bigger deal than making sure that every player who has 100% act 6 or abyss and without r3 champs still gets the title. I’m not saying the way they are implementing it is ideal, but it definitely does what it should in splitting up the cavalier players into two distinctive groups.
TheTalents had already said in a different thread he didn't care either way, now he's done a 180.
And for the record, I don't have a R3 yet. I will soon but I don't have one currently.
Please prove me wrong. Show me the lie in what I said.
This Throne breaker title is rather controversial
*and if/when they do there is nothing wrong with giving players at a specific progression milestone specific offers. It’s part of the reason for the whole system in the first place, to give players at higher tiers options suited to their level without letting players at lower tiers buy their way through the game.
I had exhausted all content at the time before I personally got the title. 30% of the champs available is an exaggeration
They aren't comparable in the current state of the game but at the time it was a legitimate issue.
Like you said 6.2 sinister and champion are also RNG fights so this whole the games only dependent on skill is a fallacy.
Who you use your t5cc on is a personal choice if you choose to wait until you get a top choice that's fine if you decide to use it on an alright champ that's ok too. At the end of the day this is a gatcha game with RNG rooted in its core
There is a group of the player base that are in the same boat I’m in. Don’t have reasonable options to rank 3 but have the materials and have beat the content.