**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Comments
Nebula
Cull
IMIW
Sabre tooth
Wasp
And
Great cyclops
Instant disagree
https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/comment/1533205/#Comment_1533205
There's far too much emphasis on rushing this new title just for the daily crystals and potentially higher tier offers. This is a title that's designed to slot into natural progression in ~6 months or so. At the moment it requires either AoL completion or Act 6 exploration but in the summer most players completing Act 6 will be using their 25% selector to form their first T5CC and target their rank ups. They'll also have far more 6* than you have because of the increased access that we're seeing.
Your right, that might be the worse 6 star roster ever.
Wasp, Sabertooth, Cull, Nebula, and Spider Gwen are all usable champs, and at that early stage of roster growth the best you can hope for is to have champs that at least have some reasonable use case. He's got several with use cases. I've seen much worse.
I've seen rosters much bigger than this with champs there are barely usable. Only used as arena fodder or as a synegy for another champ.
If you completed act 6 , then 100% will test your roster and you need more than just a R3 champ to get it done . You can expect breadth and depth required. If in fact meant “explored” instead of complete. The only thing left for you are variants and abyss. These are still going to be done best with the 5/65 champs.
Looking at your roster it doesn’t appear you are in high tier wars, but the resources you get from throne-breaker will boost your account significantly.
So you have 18 six stars and you think what? Somehow that's enough to guarantee a r3 worthy champ? I just... I dunno.
Clearly, when kabam developed the new title, 18 six stars was the target audience 😆
Alrighty then. Carry on.
You have several viable options. You don't have the worst 6* roster.
I think they wanted the target to be something like a person capable of exploring everything, but might still be working towards it due to having some bad luck with champion pulls or whatever. So they decided a parallel idea was to target players who were working on rank 3 rosters, because that was almost synonymous with players who had done everything. The odds of someone having fully explored everything and *not* ranking up rank 3 6* champs was very low. So the idea for the target player group shifted from "completed everything" to "working on rank 3s." Then the question became, if a player is "working on rank 3s" how do you detect that fact? And the obvious answer was "check to see if they actually are ranking up rank 3s." They could have made the requirement three rank 3s or five rank 3s, but they settled on one as a compromise to the issue of random luck. Someone could be sitting on their T5CC waiting for better champs than what they currently have, even if they have good choices. They could simply be waiting for better ones. So making the requirement one rank 3 was a reasonable compromise, because the people they were thinking of on average had multiple rank 3s already, or had the resources to make multiple rank 3s and just hadn't been incentivized to do it yet. But even the most unlucky of them could still almost certainly make one. So the one rank 3 Thronebreaker requirement would be one that *any* player in the target group could easily make.
jk mine is okok