**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
MF prestige?
DoubleDelta
Posts: 2,478 ★★★★
Hoping it's just a typo, any input on if the prestige is actually dropping? Or I'd there's any changes?
10
Comments
The real question is why Kabam keeps making this mistake. It really doesn't seem that hard.
I take pains to try to match the game as much as possible, this area seemed one where the extra accuracy might cause confusion but seemed worth it as the more accurate number is used for player prestige, and there are ways to see that accurate number and it's effects.
Sometimes a formatting error will cause the intended display value of 13660 to be formatted to 13659 - again it's still 13665 where it counts.