**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Comments
How exactly is fighting better so that you don't die not a skill?
Ummmm no. Diversity is meant be the tie breaker according to kabam not defender rating.
I feel compelled to actually create an account to post because am fed up having to spend so much time looking through threads for information due to you in almost all of them arguing with people. Please can you stop this as many of my alliance members have given up on coming to the forum because they too were absolutely fed up seeing you de rail threads by arguing, it took one guy 45 minutes before going through a thread to find the information needed because you were arguing for over 30 pages of that thread.
I want to be clear that this is not a personal attack but a plea on the behalf of my alliance to stop making this place extremely difficult to find an exchange information @GroundedWisdom
If defender rating an diversity were performing as their objective stated then that's is the very definition of "working as intended"
Unfortunately, the debate over D kills is a direct product made by the current system, and many great ideas have been given by those that are Pro D kills, that could help fix the problem that did not include defender kills. BTW, those that oppose D kills have yet to suggest any ideas to help fix the problem in any of the threads I kept up with regarding AW.
I've offered suggestions in the actual War Thread.
I respect your opinion and your right to voice them whether I or others agree to them or not. And I would hope and trust that you also apply the same respect to me and others here that would appreciate you making arguments with less ambiguity and clearly supported with some substantial ideas or suggestions to support them.
The reason I choose to engage in debate with you is to support the threads topic of AW scoring being broken when you make statements that are the contrary, causing the topic to appear to have less credibilty than it rightfully deserves.
When the example provided is that the system is broken because someone lost due to a marginal difference in Defender Rating or Diversity, it is worth pointing out that their intentions are for those metrics to be tie breakers, so that is as is intended. Nowhere did I say there were no issues anywhere.