**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.

Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.

Maybe a better way to let know players of what TOS have they breached.

xCristoxCristo Posts: 30
edited September 2021 in Suggestions and Requests
Could you include in the features planned some sort of email to the leader of an alliance specifying what the TOS breach has been?
My alliance had it's name replaced with a TOS name and we were confused about what happened. In the end we figured out that the main issue was only the name, but a small heads up to the leader would be helpful to avoid any missunderstanding.
Thank you for your time reading this!
@Kabam Zibiit @Kabam Miike

Comments

  • ShadowstrikeShadowstrike Posts: 3,079 ★★★★★
    This is why you're not allowed to name your alliance after body parts
  • xCristoxCristo Posts: 30

    This is why you're not allowed to name your alliance after body parts

    The name was "Cant Understand Normal Thinking", so no body parts, but this is not the point. The point is just to let leaders know what is the tos breach for. Makes everyone's lives way easier. @Shadowstrike
  • ShadowstrikeShadowstrike Posts: 3,079 ★★★★★
    xCristo said:

    This is why you're not allowed to name your alliance after body parts

    The name was "Cant Understand Normal Thinking", so no body parts, but this is not the point. The point is just to let leaders know what is the tos breach for. Makes everyone's lives way easier. @Shadowstrike
    You really don't see it? Your initials was the obvious no no
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Posts: 36,193 ★★★★★
    That's hilarious.
    "What was the name of your Alliance?"

    "Falling Umbrellas Can Kill"
  • xCristoxCristo Posts: 30

    xCristo said:

    This is why you're not allowed to name your alliance after body parts

    The name was "Cant Understand Normal Thinking", so no body parts, but this is not the point. The point is just to let leaders know what is the tos breach for. Makes everyone's lives way easier. @Shadowstrike
    You really don't see it? Your initials was the obvious no no
    So now we are also master cyphers to speak in code language... Why can't a name just mean what it is supposed to without ppl thinking of improper stuff out of nothing? If it was some random series of words, then it would be understandable, but this is a legit proposition that means something... (falling umbrella can kill is stupid and without meaning btw...)

    Anyhow, yet again, THIS IS NOT THE POINT.

    I just wanted something to inform what that tos was about to the leader, for example, "bcs of improper alliance name", or "one player in your alliance did X thing". This simple thing can save alliances to do guess working, and kabam to having a ton of tickets regarding what was the tos about or why has it been given.
  • ShadowstrikeShadowstrike Posts: 3,079 ★★★★★
    edited September 2021
    I understand where you coming from in terms of the actual definition of what you may have done wrong and how being at least told "hey X or Y is an issue that needs to be dealt with, you should deal with it" Would really help a lot of people in the future avoid making mistakes and I agree that it really would be a benefit to the community as a whole.


    That being said looking at the name you wanted to give you a line, the fact of the matter is that this is the internet and no matter how much sincerity, no matter how much honesty, no matter how much Goodwill and good intentions you have, the fact of the matter is that the internet brings out the worst in a lot of people and especially a lot of the juvenile aspects of our personalities.

    That name, those initials would have set you up for considerable amount of harassment both in obnoxious hecklers and the like, as well as legitimate complaints from women who aren't fans of that terminology. So whenever intention you had, you have to know that it was never going to end well.
  • I understand where you coming from in terms of the actual definition of what you may have done wrong and how being at least told "hey X or Y is an issue that needs to be dealt with, you should deal with it" Would really help a lot of people in the future avoid making mistakes and I agree that it really would be a benefit to the community as a whole.


    That being said looking at the name you wanted to give you a line, the fact of the matter is that this is the internet and no matter how much sincerity, no matter how much honesty, no matter how much Goodwill and good intentions you have, the fact of the matter is that the internet brings out the worst in a lot of people and especially a lot of the juvenile aspects of our personalities.

    That name, those initials would have set you up for considerable amount of harassment both in obnoxious hecklers and the like, as well as legitimate complaints from women who aren't fans of that terminology. So whenever intention you had, you have to know that it was never going to end well.

    Regardless of the name, the original intent of the message has been overlooked by the comments.

    Regardless of the name, the OP mentioned Kabam not notifying a single person in the alliance, most notably the leader. How does the alliance know what's happening? How does the alliance know if there are repercussions beyond a name change, or if that's even the issue at all? How does the alliance know what to tell members, who most likely are nervous that stuffs about to go down seeing that, especially with a rumored ban wave coming to fruition? The lack of communication about something significant from Kabam is concerning. That seems to be the bigger point of the post. The name of the alliance didn't even appear in the original post that started the thread.

    @Kabam Miike @Kabam Zibiit @Kabam Porthos @Kabam Vydious @Kabam Lyra isn't it normal to at least notify the leader of an alliance if there is a terms of service violation that impacts the alliance and not just an individual player? Why wouldn't this be the case in a situation such as this? I think the community would appreciate any clarity you could provide to this, especially in light of the well discussed ban wave that's hit the YouTube channels that actually impacted an alliance an extremely popular YT player was in.

    Thank you.
  • Bvukas11Bvukas11 Posts: 85
    Sounds like the name isn't the issue at this point. The group just wants to know if the name was the result of the ban. It could be unrelated at this point. Getting and answers for the ban reason is all there after.
Sign In or Register to comment.