**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Comments
A part of me almost wishes they just cancel the buff program so there isn't that little sliver of hope that they finally go back to doing good buffs.
I have no idea, and none of us on the player side could possibly know. Additionally, we don’t know if any of these champions will be tuned down (or up) yet. But *if* they stay in their current state, and *if* they are only in that state because internal guidelines were relaxed in light of new policy, then the new program is a good thing when it comes to new champions.
However, if the game team is in a position where they can either deliver good new champs *or* good buffs to champions, but not both, then that worries me. Champions are the money maker of this game. Rank up materials only sell if players have champions they are excited to rank up. If NetMarble or Kabam or whoever it is that makes these decisions are deciding that champion development isn’t worth funding sufficiently to get both buffs and new champions in good shape… then that’s deeply concerning.
Correction: I'm just dumb and he does work right again
btw, is Sasquatch good undupe or he really needs dupe. Thanks
Thor Jane Foster is better than previous version but still not middle of the pack level.. the 21% chance stun rng is not dependable unlike other stun-lock champions.. her shock does barely much damage.. maybe another buff would help her like what Gamora got.. 3x the charm.
New
Old
We’ve heard it from our players and feel it ourselves, some of the updates are not up to the level that Summoners had hoped. While not every Champion is meant to suddenly skyrocket to the top of the DPS charts or replace every Champion in your Roster, we feel that players are not happy with some of the updates they have received lately.
While we understand that this change will lead to fewer Champion updates per month, we believe that this will allow us to give you better quality updates every month with fewer issues.
Fewer Champion updates per month didn't lead to a better 'buff' program by any means. It has been really disappointing lately.
The most noticeable change to poor Jane Foster is her new stretched up blue-ish portrait. And that's not an improvement.
And by good I mean champs that a substantial number of players rankup & use in meaningful content
Not some buff that some minority likes bcoz the champion is "fun"
https://youtu.be/xgzazAJAWBQ
Pre-changes Jane could do the same thing
Why did they make her smaller?
Thor Jane foster neede a rework. This regular buff does nothing for her it's like a 5% upgrade.
Please look into the constructive feedback on her buff.
I know you guys have a lot on your plate. Take your time but please don't rush these buffs ...
Not like this.
Thank you.
I own a 6* sig 100 jane foster. Give meaning to her life.
Given the general disappointment of the community, I think Kabam should reflect and make it more useful. I propose, for example, that whenever she nullifies an enemy bonus she gains temporary fury (which would improve her attack), as well as the ability to deal a larger shock after holding the block (similar to Nebula). She should also have a change in her heavy attack so she doesn't miss as much, possibly like Daredevil HK, starting with a forward move, 2-3 medium hits and ending with that wonderful uppercut. All of this would be a noticeable change that would not change game balance and would be more fair to this champion.