bug or contradiction in rocket raccoon skills

is there any reason or sense in giving rocket raccoon passive anti-healing?
Because if the disadvantage is passive it is so that they cannot purify it, that's the function of passive debuffs , so that they cannot be purified, so I don't understand, why give rocket raccoon passive anti-healing, if this passive anti-healing depends on a demolition that is not passive and the demolition can be purified and when this happens the anti-healing is removed, so what is the point of giving rocket raccoon passive anti-healing?
I would understand if the debuff was not passive, that way it would make sense, but I don't find it logical, if the anti-healing is passive and the passive debuffs can't be purified , then why give rocket raccoon a passive anti-healing that depends on the demolition which is not passive and is demolition if it can be purified and thus the passive anti-healing is eliminated, It doesn't make sense for anti-healing to be passive, I think it's a contradiction.

Comments

Mackey

What?

Rafa315

There is a big mistake or rather contradiction in rocket skills, it leaves passive anti-healing and the idea of passive debuffs is that they can't purify it at least not normally, for example Kinping and mole man, they can't purify passive debuffs, so why give Rocket a passive anti-healing if it depend a non-passive demolition and because it's not passive if it can be purified and that way remove the passive anti-healing

nOux

Lol how is that contradiction?
U are passively heal blocked while affected with armor break. Purify armor break it removes heal block, how is that a mistake or contradiction?

Drugs are bad m’kay

Rafa315

the error is that the function of the passive disadvantages is that they cannot be purified, put passive disadvantages on a mole or Kinping man and they cannot be purified, then, one of rocket raccoon's abilities is to have passive healing, what is the use a passive heal break that works with a non-passive break? So the demolition can be purified and in this way the supposed passive anti-healing is eliminated, it does not make sense, because the idea of passive anti-healing is that they cannot purify it

Rafa315

Mole man***

ReignkingTW

Glad you posted this 3 times.

Furrymoosen

It makes sense because that is how his kit was written. It’s not a bug, it’s not a mistake, it’s a utility. A contradiction would be if his kit said one thing and did something else.

SHIELD4AGENT

you lost me on the anti healing and demolition part

CyborgNinja135

Think about it this way: if both were debuffs and you were fighting someone like Kingpin where they have a chance to shrug off but it's not guaranteed, you'd have to hope the armor break doesn't get purified, and then hope the heal block doesn't get purified either. Now if the heal block is passive, you only need one purify to fail. Basically, more things can go wrong if both are debuffs and that would make it more unreliable.

Personally, I don't find it to be a contradiction, it's just a nice little bonus for having an armor break on the opponent.

Pseudo_19

You could just use words like heal-block and armor break instead of anti-healing and demolition. At least that’s what I’m assuming you meant by those words.

Panchulon21

You lost me at is

GinjabredMonsta

You could just use words like heal-block and armor break instead of anti-healing and demolition. At least that’s what I’m assuming you meant by those words.

I don’t know, I’d petition to change armor break to armor demolition

CyborgNinja135

You could just use words like heal-block and armor break instead of anti-healing and demolition. At least that’s what I’m assuming you meant by those words.

Probably English isn't their native tongue. Anti-healing and demolition is how heal-block and armor break appear in the Spanish version of the game