**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
How do u like the new TB+ difficulty rewards in eq?
Darkraw346
Posts: 1,942 ★★★★
First off sorry if there's always a thread on that topic. I haven't seen any...
Second, t5cc crystal is cool, r4 mats are uhhh fine.
BUT-Wouldnt a Paragon expect more than 13K 6* shards from exploration of so much paths? I mean come on we Paragons have reached a point where 13K shards for exploration is just not it... 20-25K could do...
Thats why I thought having TB and Paragon together in the new difficulty is a bad idea...
The gold is super nice tho
Second, t5cc crystal is cool, r4 mats are uhhh fine.
BUT-Wouldnt a Paragon expect more than 13K 6* shards from exploration of so much paths? I mean come on we Paragons have reached a point where 13K shards for exploration is just not it... 20-25K could do...
Thats why I thought having TB and Paragon together in the new difficulty is a bad idea...
The gold is super nice tho
11
Comments
19k 6* shards
30555 t6b
24750 t3A
1.5 t5CC
some sig stones and a bunch of t5b and t2A
Add on the 10k 6* shards from cav EQ that’s 29k 6* shards each month from EQ (not counting lower difficulties)
As someone already said, depending on the SQ on average if you do the content you’re looking at ~40k shards a month, not even counting the big boost to shards from wars we got and battlegrounds in general. Realistically, there isn’t a lack of shards, there’s a lack of people wanting to put for effort for shards.
And they left room for the eventual T6CC add-on, which is great.
Shards are increasing everywhere like u said
Wars
Bgs
Why isn't the increase felt as much in eq as it should?
How is a 90% increase to the previous difficulty in addition to rank up mat increases not “felt as much”
The bump in difficulty/rewards are pretty much what could be expected. Not great, not bad imo.
U r right, but we literally can get like at least 60K per month from bgs and already can get 7* shards... so I think we would expect more
It might be really rewarding for someone else and definitely worth doing, but I'm getting much more rewards playing BGs for less effort and time