Bullseye… another example of why Dani’s Buff fails

BigBlueOxBigBlueOx Member Posts: 2,580 ★★★★★
in General Discussion
It’s too bad that here’s yet another champ where Dani could have been a fun option as a counter with her passive slow… but Bullseye don’t miss and Dani’s kit needs miss to be most effective. It woulda been a cool way to mitigate his bleed damage too using this falter.

But I’m stuck being reminded how this “balance” buff ignored her biggest issue and here I am looking at this fun toy with hardly any uses.

Comments

  • ZuroZuro Member Posts: 2,927 ★★★★★
    Slow doesnt even work against bullseye im pretty sure
  • TheShinyDomeTheShinyDome Member Posts: 185 ★★
    Except that wouldn't work even if it was passive because his killer instinct isn't affected by AAR. She still has plenty of uses, so you don't need to look for reasons to be angry. The example you gave here is like complaining that NF doesn't work great against photon even though he can't miss since she's bleed immune.


  • BeastDadBeastDad Member Posts: 2,039 ★★★★★
    She really is lacking in the “usefulness” department, and I agree this would have been a cool matchup for her to counter.
  • BigBlueOxBigBlueOx Member Posts: 2,580 ★★★★★
    TheShinyDome said:

    Except that wouldn't work even if it was passive because his killer instinct isn't affected by AAR. She still has plenty of uses, so you don't need to look for reasons to be angry. The example you gave here is like complaining that NF doesn't work great against photon even though he can't miss since she's bleed immune.


    lol I’m not looking for reasons. It’s a contradiction in design anywhere she could be a best in class option, it’s plain as the sun on a summer day.
  • BeastDadBeastDad Member Posts: 2,039 ★★★★★
    BigBlueOx said:

    What she needed most was something like, Dani’s abilities can’t be bypassed by skill champs.

    My contention as well, this would have at least made her relevant.
    BeroMan said:

    BigBlueOx said:

    It’s too bad that here’s yet another champ where Dani could have been a fun option as a counter with her passive slow… but Bullseye don’t miss and Dani’s kit needs miss to be most effective. It woulda been a cool way to mitigate his bleed damage too using this falter.

    But I’m stuck being reminded how this “balance” buff ignored her biggest issue and here I am looking at this fun toy with hardly any uses.

    The most ridiculous part of her buff is that because of the bug she does not even work against Nick Fury's second life and that was the whole point of her buff to make it easier against NF.
    Such a huge miss.
  • WednesdayLengthWednesdayLength Member Posts: 1,858 ★★★★
    BeroMan said:

    BigBlueOx said:

    It’s too bad that here’s yet another champ where Dani could have been a fun option as a counter with her passive slow… but Bullseye don’t miss and Dani’s kit needs miss to be most effective. It woulda been a cool way to mitigate his bleed damage too using this falter.

    But I’m stuck being reminded how this “balance” buff ignored her biggest issue and here I am looking at this fun toy with hardly any uses.

    The most ridiculous part of her buff is that because of the bug she does not even work against Nick Fury's second life and that was the whole point of her buff to make it easier against NF.
    I mean that's a bug with nick though not dani
  • OurobørosOurobøros Member Posts: 1,872 ★★★★★
    edited January 2024
    Should have add just a little "skill champs abilities to bypass miss don't work against Dani" it would be amazing
  • OurobørosOurobøros Member Posts: 1,872 ★★★★★
    Opandemonio said:

    Should have add just a little "skill champs abilities to bypass miss don't work against Dani" it would be amazing

    Sorry, someone already said that 🤦🏻‍♂️
  • BigBlueOxBigBlueOx Member Posts: 2,580 ★★★★★
    Opandemonio said:

    Opandemonio said:

    Should have add just a little "skill champs abilities to bypass miss don't work against Dani" it would be amazing

    Sorry, someone already said that 🤦🏻‍♂️
    It’s ok! Apparently it wasn’t said enough around the rebalance table.
Sign In or Register to comment.