Here we go again. Another BG rant

Thank you Kabam, for my latest streak of 11 mindblowingly wonderful consecutive losses.

Once I've reached Vibranium, I'm thoroughly "S" r@7ed.

I'm almost constantly up against 60k, 50k opponents, using my 16k (and rarely 20k) champs.

Meanwhile, my oppoents are happily pounding away on my 40k and sometimes 35/7 k defenders (using their 30k champs).

Damn!

There has (got) to be something wrong with your matchmaking.

Comments

ahmynuts

There has (gyatt) to be something wrong g with you if you think there's something wrong with matchmaking

Kanooo

There has (gyatt) to be something wrong g with you if you think there's something wrong with matchmaking

I also think that you have got to be "nuts".

ahmynuts

There has (gyatt) to be something wrong g with you if you think there's something wrong with matchmaking

I also think that you have got to be "nuts".

You are the first person on here to make thus joke. It almost brings a tear to my eye out of happiness. Thank you

WinterFields

*Sees there's a problem*
*Problem can't be with me*
*If I'm not the problem, it must be the matchmaking*

Kanooo

*Sees there's a problem*
*Problem can't be with me*
*If I'm not the problem, it must be the matchmaking*

Tell me. Do you get paid to defend Kabam?

xLunatiXx

Skill issue, no matchmaking issue

Furrymoosen

So you either want easier access to the same rewards that bigger accounts also compete for, or you want a game mode with lesser rewards that has easier opponents? If you're going to complain about what is and isn't fair, then you have to pick one, and anyone should be able to see why the first option is never going to be fair.

You hit your cap. Wait a little later into the season and more smaller accounts will move up for you to face and the tougher accounts will move onto the circuit. Grow your roster, come back bigger and better next time. That's the nature of open and fair competition.

WinterFields

*Sees there's a problem*
*Problem can't be with me*
*If I'm not the problem, it must be the matchmaking*
Tell me. Do you get paid to defend Kabam?

I wish I was good enough of this game to get paid.

In all seriousness, people who complain about BG matchmaking almost always have an unspoken assumption, that they should be able to advance further than they currently are but are unable to because stronger accounts block them out.

If that is the case, what is the "fair" progression that people should be able to achieve? Just getting to the GC, Gamma, Arcane, Celestial? Not everyone is meant to get to the GC, let alone the top tiers of GC. How far do you think is it "fair" for you to advance?

Colinwhitworth69

Matchmaking is working as intended. As you rise through the competition, it gets harder. It is that simple. Fewer people with less developed rosters have made it as far as you, and you can only match people in your tier and who are looking for a match at the same moment you are. Kabam isn't trying to give us equal matches outside of that, and they shouldn't.

JLordVileJ

There has (gyatt) to be something wrong g with you if you think there's something wrong with matchmaking

I also think that you have got to be "nuts".
You are the first person on here to make thus joke. It almost brings a tear to my eye out of happiness. Thank you

AGHKK WHY DIDNT I THINK OF THIS JOKE #sodissappintedinmyself

CoMinow

*Sees there's a problem*
*Problem can't be with me*
*If I'm not the problem, it must be the matchmaking*
Tell me. Do you get paid to defend Kabam?

I wish I was good enough of this game to get paid.

In all seriousness, people who complain about BG matchmaking almost always have an unspoken assumption, that they should be able to advance further than they currently are but are unable to because stronger accounts block them out.

If that is the case, what is the "fair" progression that people should be able to achieve? Just getting to the GC, Gamma, Arcane, Celestial? Not everyone is meant to get to the GC, let alone the top tiers of GC. How far do you think is it "fair" for you to advance?

What are you smoking???
Matchmaking and skill aren’t the same thing.
The fairness comes into play all the time. I regularly fight people with 5 ⭐️ on their roster and i have 97 7* champs. I also run into people with more than 20+ rank 3 champs which puts me at a disadvantage but is much closer of a match.

You should never have to play against accounts twice your size. It’s not the progression that’s unfair. It’s the people that you’re playing against having a bigger roster size. I can’t believe you would even defend this. They must pay you well or you’re ignoring inarguable facts. It’s a fact this is a broken system. Unless it’s geared that way for the $5 it costs to keep playing and putting up points

EdisonLaw

I’m sensing a skill issue here

willrun4adonut

Just so you know when we someone complains about matchmaking, Kabam changes their match matching algorithm and gives you even harder opponents for the next ten matches.

willrun4adonut

*Sees there's a problem*
*Problem can't be with me*
*If I'm not the problem, it must be the matchmaking*
Tell me. Do you get paid to defend Kabam?

I wish I was good enough of this game to get paid.

In all seriousness, people who complain about BG matchmaking almost always have an unspoken assumption, that they should be able to advance further than they currently are but are unable to because stronger accounts block them out.

If that is the case, what is the "fair" progression that people should be able to achieve? Just getting to the GC, Gamma, Arcane, Celestial? Not everyone is meant to get to the GC, let alone the top tiers of GC. How far do you think is it "fair" for you to advance?
What are you smoking???
Matchmaking and skill aren’t the same thing.
The fairness comes into play all the time. I regularly fight people with 5 ⭐️ on their roster and i have 97 7* champs.

Skill issue if you've lost 11 matches in a row. I have 68 7* and am chilling in Gamma right now. And I am by no means an excellent player.

captaincush

Alsi, comparing PI means almost nothing. Rarity, rank, and sig level are better indicators of roster strength

BringPopcorn

The denial of some players...
You reached or got close to your roof, you got a small account with a small deck and got to Vibranium 5, its not the matchmaking its where you are standing in the game.

WinterFields

*Sees there's a problem*
*Problem can't be with me*
*If I'm not the problem, it must be the matchmaking*
Tell me. Do you get paid to defend Kabam?

I wish I was good enough of this game to get paid.

In all seriousness, people who complain about BG matchmaking almost always have an unspoken assumption, that they should be able to advance further than they currently are but are unable to because stronger accounts block them out.

If that is the case, what is the "fair" progression that people should be able to achieve? Just getting to the GC, Gamma, Arcane, Celestial? Not everyone is meant to get to the GC, let alone the top tiers of GC. How far do you think is it "fair" for you to advance?
What are you smoking???
Matchmaking and skill aren’t the same thing.
The fairness comes into play all the time. I regularly fight people with 5 ⭐️ on their roster and i have 97 7* champs. I also run into people with more than 20+ rank 3 champs which puts me at a disadvantage but is much closer of a match.

You should never have to play against accounts twice your size. It’s not the progression that’s unfair. It’s the people that you’re playing against having a bigger roster size. I can’t believe you would even defend this. They must pay you well or you’re ignoring inarguable facts. It’s a fact this is a broken system. Unless it’s geared that way for the $5 it costs to keep playing and putting up points

Respectfully, that still doesn't answer my question. How far should a player "fairly" be able to reach given it's a competition against everyone?

Usagicassidy

*If I'm not the problem, it must be the matchmaking*

This is what I always tell my friends after my failed relationships. It's their fault.

BringPopcorn

*If I'm not the problem, it must be the matchmaking*
This is what I always tell my friends after my failed relationships. It's their fault.

Your relationships are not developed enough, try telling that to a wife 💀

PT_99

Now tell us why you think that you deserve to face easy competition
While others have to go through tough?
Even when rewards are same, competition is same? 🫠

PT_99

The denial of some players...
You reached or got close to your roof, you got a small account with a small deck and got to Vibranium 5, its not the matchmaking its where you are standing in the game.

"Wrong, I watch msd and beroman BG YouTube fights and clearly I can also play like that."

😤😤

JT_Supreme

You’re in vibranium and there’s still like half the season left, be patient

Boxermyke

The Entitlement Stops Here!

willrun4adonut

The Entitlement Stops Here!

Actually, I think it stopped five days ago on August 6th.

Nightheart

Well whenever I see posts like this this is what I will say... ☕️☕️☕️

WednesdayLength

*Sees there's a problem*
*Problem can't be with me*
*If I'm not the problem, it must be the matchmaking*
Tell me. Do you get paid to defend Kabam?

I wish I was good enough of this game to get paid.

In all seriousness, people who complain about BG matchmaking almost always have an unspoken assumption, that they should be able to advance further than they currently are but are unable to because stronger accounts block them out.

If that is the case, what is the "fair" progression that people should be able to achieve? Just getting to the GC, Gamma, Arcane, Celestial? Not everyone is meant to get to the GC, let alone the top tiers of GC. How far do you think is it "fair" for you to advance?
What are you smoking???
Matchmaking and skill aren’t the same thing.
The fairness comes into play all the time. I regularly fight people with 5 ⭐️ on their roster and i have 97 7* champs. I also run into people with more than 20+ rank 3 champs which puts me at a disadvantage but is much closer of a match.

You should never have to play against accounts twice your size. It’s not the progression that’s unfair. It’s the people that you’re playing against having a bigger roster size. I can’t believe you would even defend this. They must pay you well or you’re ignoring inarguable facts. It’s a fact this is a broken system. Unless it’s geared that way for the $5 it costs to keep playing and putting up points

If what you're asking for happens then players with higher skill levels and rosters will only ever play harder accounts which actively punishes progression.

You hit your ceiling and that's fine, there's no problem with the matchmaking it's with your expectations

Ironman3000

Why do you deserve to win fights against players who are better than you?