**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Attacker Bonus issues
Supermanoj
Posts: 87 ★
So we lost this last war, not disputing the loss seems like that would have happened regardless. But the attacker bonus seems very off. We had a total defender kill of 78 but somehow that translates to an attacker bonus for them of 446, meaning they only died 4 times. Looking at the defender kills from the war. 25 12 and 6 were defender kills from 3 different players. If we assume all those kills were from one champ (which they weren't) that would mean a reduction in the attacker bonus of 9 from the maximum of 450. Following that similar reasoning, just from the screen shots I've shown the attacker bonus would be a minimum reduction of 23 to give them 427 at the very most and not 446.
As I'm not sure how their defender kills were spread out I can't say what our maximum would be but I'm assuming it's lower than theirs. And yes I've tried going to support over this but they seem to be unable to see a mathematical issue with this scenario.
0
Comments
Most likely it is including the empty nodes. There are 55 nodes in each battlegroup, so the maximum is probably 165 times the 240 or 39,600 points. Just my speculation.
Each node has 3 attacker bonuses
55 x 3 = 165
Three battle groups, consisting of 165 bonuses
495 TOTAL attack bonus
They lost 44 total attack bonus on you
You should. Otherwise not placing defense is a good way to prevent the other team from getting attacker bonus points, which would make not placing defense yet again a strategy to win.
Wrong. They said from the beginning that empty nodes would give full attack bonus.
Really? where in that post does it say 495. They said 450. So get your facts right.
Ok so the picture is wrong clearly, but as you have been told numerous times that empty nodes get full attack bonus. Accept that as the reason why they were capable of that attacker score and move on.
And why shouldn't get attacker bonus for empty nodes? If you didn't, then teams would just not place defenders and guarentee up to almost 40k point advantage. Teams would win by not placing defenders.
How many times as the above been told to you in different ways? smh...
Asks a valid question>gets perfectly valid answers>dismisses answers = trolling