**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.

Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.

War Proposal

Guys what do you think if Kabam in place of base section can create base for Alliance war defence, to add more wars. This war sistem is boring we can only play one war per 48hours. What i mean? Monday to Friday is for Alliance war attack phase only, and weekends are for alliance war defence phase. With this system we can get 5 AW per week and players can choose how much wars alliance will play. This will be nice for Season 2. More wars, more rewards, more fun!
Best regards!

Comments

  • Exspellies133Exspellies133 Posts: 182
    U could have a best of 5 with a particular ally in a week, how bout that?
  • GwendolineGwendoline Posts: 945 ★★★
    kushstar88 wrote: »
    they need to consider total ally rating and not just war rating. a similar war rating does not equal an even ally matchup. this has been happening since seasons was introduced. my 3.3 ally would always face 5 to 6 to sometimes 9 or 10 million allys cause of our war rating being so high (1166).

    this needs to be fixed asap where an ally rating is considered for matchups and not just war ratings....

    This has nothing to do with the topic.
  • ChosenOne94ChosenOne94 Posts: 108
    Totally agreed with you guys, thay really need to consider that..
    If they can change 5 day aw like aq and that problem with matchups it would be a good start after all..
  • DL864DL864 Posts: 1,089 ★★★
    kushstar88 wrote: »
    they need to consider total ally rating and not just war rating. a similar war rating does not equal an even ally matchup. this has been happening since seasons was introduced. my 3.3 ally would always face 5 to 6 to sometimes 9 or 10 million allys cause of our war rating being so high (1166).

    this needs to be fixed asap where an ally rating is considered for matchups and not just war ratings....

    This happened when war was first released. Guess what happened you had small ally’s in tier one playing on an easier map against small ally’s getting the same rewards as top war ally’s at a Mich easier level that’s why match ups are based on war rating. Now if you are constantly getting match ups with ally’s 2&3 times your rating I would say your ally is over performing. Which is good but that’s the match ups you are gonna get.
Sign In or Register to comment.