War Rating Should Erode If an Alliance Doesn't Do 2 Wars in a Week
TacoScotty
Member Posts: 407 ★★
There needs to be a way for war rating to erode for inactivity now that AW season was introduced in which points are based on your War Rating tier and the top 3 tiers have more limited spots.
I would recommend war rating decreases by 120 - 140 per week in which an alliance did not participate in 2 wars. 2 wars makes up for any match making lag causing you to miss a war during a week. This drop would be roughly equal to if they did 2 wars and lost them both and allows their war rating to stop distorting some tiers (e.g. currently a few are preventing Active alliances from getting x8 multiplier as I counted several top 50 war rating alliances who didn't look to even do a single war since AW season started). The decrease is still at a slow enough pace that if an alliance had a major breakup they can take a couple weeks to focus on rebuilding without falling too far behind on rating.
I would recommend war rating decreases by 120 - 140 per week in which an alliance did not participate in 2 wars. 2 wars makes up for any match making lag causing you to miss a war during a week. This drop would be roughly equal to if they did 2 wars and lost them both and allows their war rating to stop distorting some tiers (e.g. currently a few are preventing Active alliances from getting x8 multiplier as I counted several top 50 war rating alliances who didn't look to even do a single war since AW season started). The decrease is still at a slow enough pace that if an alliance had a major breakup they can take a couple weeks to focus on rebuilding without falling too far behind on rating.
0
Comments
The war rating should erode OR at the end of the season they should reset war ratings based on rankings in last season (e.g. #1 in rankings starts season 2 with highest rating and some formula approach to assign ratings to everyone else). In the later case, those who did 0 wars would essentially have their rating wiped
Just to maintain their war rating, but forgoing all the good rewards?
Is this really a problem?
Agree, cant think of a squad that would be willing to lose out on rewards short n long term just to troll others
So I am back to my original comment but now for more than one reason.
It makes sense if they are not waring they should drop...
They may not take up the leaderboard from season points but they take a spot in a higher tier and a higher multiplier from someone else that stops limits their points.
Imagine this.... all bar 3 alliences in tier 1 disbanded and quit..... leaving only 2 alliances with the x8 multiplier.....
They would almost be assured top season rewards as their would be no direct competion....
So there is potential here for a big issue
war reating is earned by wining war. Not playing war will not grant war rating, nor will grant season points. whoever are at low war reating and asking to decrease war rating of alliances not playing war is because they are loosing a lot of war and thinks (wrongly) that punishing other can help them.
Not all allyes can afford to play all year for season rewards. We had taken the decision to skip summer season and be back for Autumn one. this can't hindrance your war rating nor your season score. We earn on the battleground our war rating. earn your aswell.
Rather then speaking about war reating, let's talk about how wrongly war rewards are distributed among tiers. 2 more war season and whoever is in Plat 2 will never ever reach plat 1.
2 more war seasons and there will be no reason to alk about war reating, Master and Plat 1 ally will never leave those positions.
also just cus you earnt something doesnt mean you should keep it.....
you should need to play to keep it......
it makes sense that a rating you earnt by winning wars requires playing wars to keep it......
Holding out on other people to get in top tiers
How does just a rating affect it? Once we have no ranking, our rating should be meaningless in any kind of standing whatsoever.
What you write if far from having a sense imho.
This reasoning have no fundamentals, expecialy if you are not talking about top 50 alliances.
It makes sense also that at the end of a season, in any game, all start anew. So zero war rating for all alliance and all start with 0 points.
And by the way, just to undertand, what do you think to obtain decreasing war rating by 120/140 per week? what if allyes start to play 3 full bg 2 times a week and just one bg in the weekend with the 10 avaible playes?
I don't know if they only include war inactivity, or only total inactivity, but there's this.