UPDATE: A new Hotfix (v32.2.3) is now being released to address this issue. Please keep an eye on your App Store for this update to address the below issue.

We are currently experiencing an Error when Summoners view a Champion’s Synergies while in the Champion Selection screen in Arenas and Duels. We are aware of this issue and are working on a Hotfix to address it. In the meantime, please avoid using the synergy menu to prevent this error and crash. We apologize for this inconvenience. Updates will be posted here: https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/293506/error-when-looking-at-synergies-from-champion-selection-screen

It’s a little funny?

SighsohardSighsohard Posts: 604 ★★★
How everyone(and I mean nearly everyone) begged for a fix to the issue with the relation between MD and Dexterity. Kabam pushes it aside. Then made blade. Then made diversity. They basically did all they could to not address it (in the same way the community suggested). To in the end. Doing exactly what the community said. They’re quite frankly too proud to admit that WE might actually KNOW what’s best for this game. Since WE play it daily lol

Comments

  • CinnCinn Posts: 81
    It’s actually more about profit than it is listening to the players.
  • SighsohardSighsohard Posts: 604 ★★★
    of Course it is. And they’re making this move for profit no? Or you’re saying this time it’s not about profit?

    Or you’re saying this change is about profit and the original solution the community offered would have get them to this point?

    I’m confused?
  • CinnCinn Posts: 81
    I mean this will change too once they’ve hit a point where they are no longer making profit from “changing the meta”. This has nothing to do with the players enjoyment of the game or that they are listening to the players. They’ve actually just increased the spending of those who do spend (increased item use due to more difficulty of nodes). And, the change to diversity has a few effects; increased the value of champs currently available by purchasing crystals(imiw, domino) and devaluing all of the resources a player has spent to rank for some diversity.
    It is nice to think they listen to the consumer but the facts don’t support it.. although, it really would be cool if it were true .
  • SighsohardSighsohard Posts: 604 ★★★
    Cinn wrote: »
    I mean this will change too once they’ve hit a point where they are no longer making profit from “changing the meta”. This has nothing to do with the players enjoyment of the game or that they are listening to the players. They’ve actually just increased the spending of those who do spend (increased item use due to more difficulty of nodes). And, the change to diversity has a few effects; increased the value of champs currently available by purchasing crystals(imiw, domino) and devaluing all of the resources a player has spent to rank for some diversity.
    It is nice to think they listen to the consumer but the facts don’t support it.. although, it really would be cool if it were true .

    I mean... I couldn’t disagree more. I’m in gold 1 platinum 3. No whale by any stretch of the imagination. I can tell you this. 80% of my alliance buys t2a every week. We walk through aw since day 1 rarely dying at all. Not sure what it’s like above us obviously....... diversity was NOT ABOUT making money lol. If you can’t kill a diverse defender..... minis and bosses with insane buffs... sure. Heal and revive. But instead of buying t2a 2 times a week celebrate your season rewards and spend lots. It’s all relative...
  • SighsohardSighsohard Posts: 604 ★★★
    Won’t let me edit x2 t2a a week. Every week.
  • CinnCinn Posts: 81
    Diversity as defenders in war was not about money.. the change to diversity was about money.. I too am gold 1/plat 3 and no whale either. But those who are did spend money and did have some focus on diversity where they could’ve spent said resources elsewhere which, they will now have to do to rank up defenders they wouldn’t have ranked up due to diversity in the past. The change back is also likely due to money as stronger defenders= more potion use for those competing in higher tiers.
    I’m cheap so, I honestly can’t imagine spending a lot of money in the first place. However, any inclination to spend even a little is diminished with the “meta-change”.
  • SighsohardSighsohard Posts: 604 ★★★
    Cinn wrote: »
    Diversity as defenders in war was not about money.. the change to diversity was about money.. I too am gold 1/plat 3 and no whale either. But those who are did spend money and did have some focus on diversity where they could’ve spent said resources elsewhere which, they will now have to do to rank up defenders they wouldn’t have ranked up due to diversity in the past. The change back is also likely due to money as stronger defenders= more potion use for those competing in higher tiers.
    I’m cheap so, I honestly can’t imagine spending a lot of money in the first place. However, any inclination to spend even a little is diminished with the “meta-change”.

    My experience is different than yours man. I don’t know how to explain it. I have over 800 map 5 crystals. Over 30 glory crystals. More than 1500 t4cc crystals. It was a terrible debacle of an idea. None of us had to spend resources trying to be diverse. Cuz we just put 4/40s out there and still won 60% of our wars. You did it wrong. And we ended at the same place. Except I have more resources than you. It seems.

    A 5/50 DD gets less kills than a 4/40 MC LoL. All day. Everyday.
  • SighsohardSighsohard Posts: 604 ★★★
    Also forgot to mention. I’ve never spent more than $20 on this game. TOTAL lol. It doesn’t require spending. It requires a more valuable resource. Time.
  • CinnCinn Posts: 81
    Young man? Little passive aggressiveness much? Sorry you don’t like someone with a different viewpoint. Your rather defensive response actually makes me a little sad to think how you must respond to a differing viewpoint in real life. So, good luck to you sir.
  • ezmoneyezmoney Posts: 208
    so extremely frustrating
Sign In or Register to comment.