**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Comments
I see now, good priority btw, keep it up
My thoughts exactly, only stuff that's beneficial to players is delayed.
We need the extra glory to fund the harder AW.
Dear, why not return with the previous version until you found a solution to the problem?
Too bad you don’t delay also the new changes to AW.
New miniboss/nodes SUCKS!
So if im understanding correctly we are not getting milestone rewards anymore instead we are getting all milestones on day 5 which is going to make it harder to get the specific catalyst type we need.
If any business course in the country is currently advocating enabling new features in a widely deployed software system build that shows instability and functionality problems on the margins soon after deployment, I would recommend getting a refund on your tuition and using the funds to set the campus on fire.
Hasn't most updates been bugged with some nearly unplayable content in this game throughout it's history? At least that's what most long timers tell me so I can't confirm it.
Come on, you are not GroundedWisdom! Calling these new features is a push, at most enhancements, specially the glory store update! Meanwhile the AW map update is on... I'm sure there is a good reason for such delays, yet I can't understand how these may interfere, a more detailed justification would be appreciated!
The changes require a stable Build. They are likely working it into the Update that addresses the overheating issue. Any Dev would likely consider it prudent planning regardless, to ensure that things are running as optimally as possible before introducing changes that affect mass Rewards.
In fact, that's one of the most common complaints. "Why don't you fix A before releasing B.".
Come on, you are not DNA3000! Changes were introduced today that affect mass... profit! I'm sure there is a good reason for such delays, yet I can't understand how these may interfere, a more detailed justification would be appreciated!
There's not much to detail. It's been said that they need a stable Build, and it's just common sense to wait with everything going on that they're trying to resolve.
There have been many times in the past when activating new features, even apparently innocuous ones on the surface, caused significant problems with both clients and servers (like, almost every time). Although Kabam has often moved forward with their scheduled updates regardless, that doesn't make it the safe or reasonable thing to do in general. And if someone is teaching otherwise in some MIS course somewhere, I am deadly serious that I'd like to know who and where, so I can try to talk them out of a career in academia. It just makes my profession look like it is filled with more idiots than it already is.
I'm disappointed that you are not aware of today's changes.
you should play alliance war to see for yourself, oh wait, I forgot, you are in a retirement alliance or did that change?
My mistake. You meant the changes to War, that you view to be for profit, when in actuality are the direct result of people complaining the Map was too easy. Perhaps I didn't think of it because I'm not of the opinion it's all just to milk the Players.
Those changes have been scheduled for some time now, and were already set in motion. The aforementioned changes have a tentative date, pending the issues being resolved. That much has been stated from the onset of announcing them. Considering they have more control over holding off with it, that's the wisest choice.
Many of them have been, far more than I find acceptable anyway. And if there exists a business school that teaches that once you've screwed up enough times, might as well keep going, I am unaware of it. Maybe they started doing that when they changed grade school math.
You have missed the point... twice! Out of curiosity, why do you always brag about software engineering knowledge? You certainly know that many in the community are on same "field", and there is always someone who know more/better... Honestly, I enjoy many of your community interactions, yet being a very experienced software engineer (and architect) myself, working at a highly appraised core dev team, have to note your recurrent brag as something you should really nerf. Please take it as constructive criticism.
Show me the posts where people complained AW was too easy.
You can paint it as you want, some changes were activated, other changes weren't, I don't understand why and I had my share of 6 months profiling and hacking Android kernel so my (most probably faulty) Nexus 5X wouldn't reach up to 70ºC running the game! Now imagine who doesn't know a thing about the matter, oh wait you are not DNA3000...
The fact that you find statements about fundamental operational best practices to be a "brag" suggests to me the value of those appraisals are suspect. However, if you feel you have some superior knowledge of the subject you feel compelled to educate me on, I'm perfectly willing to have that discussion off-thread.
Use the Search.