**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Comments
Chances are that would be a mistake, considering there is a reasonable chance you will find the 6*, assuming you have a steady source of 5* and 6* shards...
I mean, he was basically just saying it's all RNG. And like that post showed, you've said the same thing multiple times. But yeah, it is **** that it's hard to dupe 5*, lord knows how many more **** pulls i'm gonna get, but it is all RNG in the end
I could post them again . Or just search for GroundedWisdon and posts with either "RNG" and/or "Designed". Each keyword will get you pages upon pages of similar comments from OP to others.
I thought they were extremely constructive. I was just pointing back to the exact same advice that the OP (you) has given time and time again to others. What's wrong with using actual, factual references (links and pictures) to back up data? Especially when the same guy who came to complain has basically said there's no reason to in the past? I dunno.
The point is, you throw RNG out there all the time. So don't complain here that you can't get a 5* dupe because it is RNG.
I know it's RNG. I'm not debating that. I'm not saying it's rigged, or that the odds should increase the more you open, or that it means the Drop Rate means even distribution, or that people receive better pulls for good behaviour, or anything else you pull up that has to do with RNG. I am aware it's RNG. You can keep spamming that, but the only thing you're contributing is negativity.