**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Game Down Aug. 9 [Merged Threads]
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Same goes for AQ or event quest or even arena
You're not seeing how giving that name could reveal their methods of detection, as well as open up privacy concerns, disputes of actions, etc.
Lol.. u must be kidding.. don't want to waste my time on trying to reason with you. I have seen a few guys like you in the forums.
Totally agree... if someone has violated the ToS then just ban them.
This would make life easier for Alliance leaders aswell.
How would it reveal their methods? And what are the privacy ramifications, given the fact that in-game names are fictitious? I don't suppose "G.R. Ounded Wisdom III" graces your home mailbox, or does it? ;-) Also, Kabam's policy is the exception here, not the rule. Check the most preeminent PC gaming platform, Steam: if a player is banned from ANY Steam game, it says so on their profile. In detail. Including dates, number of times, et cetera. Moreover, you can check that info even if you don't play the same game as the offender. As for MCOC, due to its team-based character, implementing a similar system is even more paramount, because (a) if they don't, alliances will keep getting punished without being able to take countermeasures, such as kicking the offender, and (b) cheaters can hop from alliance to alliance, harming all those that happen to recruit them.