**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
RDTs/compensation for people affected by SS 'bugfix'?
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
They may have called it a bug, but it wasn't a bug if that's how all other staggers are supposed to work. COMBINED, they were game-breaking and I agreed that the second one was indeed a bug. Alone, the first one was just more powerful than they expected, but not game breaking. If they wanted to change the way specifically his stagger works, that's fine by me, but it doesn't justify not allowing people to rank him down if he was working as he should have been. I'm not one to just jump to demanding RDT's. I didn't think they were necessary for GP or Hela, but I think they're necessary for SS.
Exactly, there was nothing hinting that SS wasn't working as intended, not like what happened with Hela.
The only difference is what matters is what they say. If it wasn't what they intended for him and if it was game-breaking, it was necessary to change.
As for the Tickets, you can't have it one way and not the other. This is no different than any other fix. They weren't warranted with the others, and they aren't warranted now. That becomes a Pandora's Box.
Think over the LoL damage cap ON A 3*.
There can be a difference between a bug and something not working as intended. With that said, I'm gonna try to restrain myself from responding to you anymore on this thread as it just seems pointless and I'm just gonna be repeating myself.
What you never seem to be able to grasp is that Kabam is a company selling a product for real money. If they advertise a product one way and it turn out to be different and they fix it, well and good. But when people spend real money to buy something that has been advertised and tested and then it gets changed due to a "bug" that was part of the sales pitch it's entirely different. The company actually told us that AA was working as intended, for example, and real money decisions were made accordingly. Labeling the change in him a "bug" after the fact doesn't change the ethical responsibility for the sale. In the case of SS he was featured in EQ and beta tested. People bought him, tested him out and reported and more people bought him. Telling us he wasn't meant to be this good after people paid real money for him doesn't change the facts of the sale. Imagine if you bought a sports car and after the sale, the company recalled it and gave it back to you with 1/2 the horsepower, explaining that it was never intended to have the power it had when you bought it. How is this any different?
Nerfs and necessary fixes are not mutually exclusive. Being a necessary fix doesn't make it not a nerf, and it doesn't remove the obligation for compensation for people that bought the product.
LOL in every other area of commerce, selling a bugged product doesn't magically remove any obligation from the company to the people that bought the product. That's why refunds exist. All your posts on the subject draw conclusions from a false premise.
Except that little TOS which everyone should familiarize themselves with. You're not acutally buying anything. You're leasing permission to use their product. A product that they reserve the right to change as they see fit, for the sake of the game itself.
yeah... this bad.....
crazy insane completely OP and broken no questions asked.
UC difficulty aegon from 86% health to dead in a split second.
that is crazy and needed to be fixed no matter what way you look at it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ContestOfChampions/comments/9v277o/well_that_was_easy/
the big bug and what broke him beyond belief him came out in with the ve 21 release. he was fixed merely hours after that.
pretty quick response time if you ask me.
the severe damage delt by him is something that could not be left alone.
he was broken beyond anything we have seen. he made pre v12 thor look like a baby.
To those that say other champs stagger removes all buffs how bout this?
Its just the same how nullify sometimes nullifies one buff and sometimes nullfies all buffs depending on who applies it and how they apply it why cant stagger be the same hey?
SW critical hit nullify = nullify one buff
Magik sp3 = nullify all buffs
But what about when multiple buffs trigger at the same exact time? They are all the "next buff that triggers". Sure, it could be debated whether or not it's supposed to stagger one buff or multiple buffs if triggered at the same time, but other champs' staggers are worded pretty much the same way, that it nullifies or prevents the "next buff" from activating. Yeah, they could say stagger is only supposed to negate a single buff, but they confirmed themselves that this change is specific to SS and doesn't affect the stagger of other champs even though they're worded similarly. That's where the issue is. Also, if they decide that all staggers should only nullify a single buff, then buffet and masochism nodes need fixed as well.
It reiterates the fact that they can change anything and everything without consequences or a second thought about the player base. Also the changes will always happen after the eq.
If they have been releasing bugged champs, then fixing them, then why not have them test first and then release as bosses, but oh no that would affect the turnover.
Who's to say that Aegon or the champion are working as intended.
YOU AINT FIGHTING FOR NO ONE. DONT WORRY ABOUT WHATS IN ANOTHER MANS POCKET. PLAY THE GAME FOR WHAT IS WORTH.