**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Synergies in AW defense
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
An awoken Iceman (Ice Armour), awoken Gwenpool (signature), awoken Luke Cage (signature), an awoken Ghost with Hood synergy. That's four counters to mitigate the damage/avoid damage completely.
Killmonger + Black Panther CW. That's another.
There could also be adjustments made to nodes or a cap to how much power a hero without a persistent charge starts with - so defenders can only start the fight with max two bars of power, where-as someone like Bishop whose power/persistent charge allows it, can enter a fight as an attacker with more than two bars of power.
I don't doubt that many nodes + defender synergies would be insane; but THAT is what Kabam should be tweaking; those are the nodes Kabam should be adjusting. Not "Alliances are 100% war maps and we don't like it; let's create new nodes to nerf the current meta and release a whole bunch of RNG heroes who will be insane defenders."
I agree, 20 hp would be insignificant, but it’s not 20, it’s 20%... big difference
That ability is actually just 20% . Not flat value. So u will revive at 20% of noded hp
This comment is both redundant and stupid. You obviously didn't even grasp what this discussion is about.
Original post was not crying about AW defense - it was a simple question. Point of the discussion below was never ever about making our defense stronger(hence several comments about re-doing nodes in case of activating synergies), but make it more interesting, more interactive. And it was literally mentioned here several times that we are all aware also opponent defense would became stronger, I mean, it's pretty obvious, you are not the only one who figured it out, genius.
Point is for some of us it wouldn't matter - AW is now set up to be 100% cleared EVERY SINGLE TIME, does that look too hard for you? More often than not, you can even 100% clear all 3 maps and still lose the War, what sense does it make for this to become usual? There are only details that decides...besides (someone mentioned even this here before, you would just have to actually read) it was not even Kabam's original intention for Wars to be like that. That's why I said it wouldn't matter because it would of course shifted whole War paradigm where it is not a must to clear 100% every single time to actually win...
So next time you wanna contribute to discussion, better read what is discussed first Otherwise, your empty statements are misplaced.
Thanks
20% = 20 percent lol.
Also as mentioned by the other guy, it doesn’t specify so most likely be node boosted 20%
This is something they have been working on for years but still nothing
We don't have a set timeframe for this, but rest assured knowing it is thoroughly being looked into.