**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Did Kabam take the opinions of players before rolling the new War matchmaking system?
HamedSO
Posts: 139 ★
Dear all,
I'm a leader of 15m alliance. I have 30 players in the alliance that attack phase starting time doesn't suit them! While the new matchmaking system can be accurate (we never got inaccurate one with the old system), but there are a lot of things that need to be revised include the 20 hours for putting defenders and the attack starting time. Please allow leaders/officers to specify the start time or select when attack phase starts. The idea of signing up for next match can be good and can save time as you can sign up for next war during the attack phase guaranteeing that you will never miss a war during the season! But deducting 4 hours for matchmaking from the defense phase total time is not good. Also not being able to control the attack phase starting time is not good as well!
Regards,
HamedSO
I'm a leader of 15m alliance. I have 30 players in the alliance that attack phase starting time doesn't suit them! While the new matchmaking system can be accurate (we never got inaccurate one with the old system), but there are a lot of things that need to be revised include the 20 hours for putting defenders and the attack starting time. Please allow leaders/officers to specify the start time or select when attack phase starts. The idea of signing up for next match can be good and can save time as you can sign up for next war during the attack phase guaranteeing that you will never miss a war during the season! But deducting 4 hours for matchmaking from the defense phase total time is not good. Also not being able to control the attack phase starting time is not good as well!
Regards,
HamedSO
4
Comments
Point being, if your attack phase starts at night, and you wake up to go to a job throughout the day, then how is that fair for either of us? (unless you play MCOC at your job instead of working)
I’m in an Alliance where a lot of players are overseas. While those of us who are in America don’t have a lot of problems, they are asleep when the War is running down.
And this new War we got into this time started WAY too early. By the time most of our American players woke up, the War was almost over.
Seriously, AW placement and battling needs to be returned to the way it was before. This new way of doing it is horrible and is going to cause a lot of problems for Alliances that are a mix of American and Overseas players.
Well that's not going to happen, it is called the laws of physics. So compromises have to be made. A lot of European players got disadvantaged for years. I really think North Americans shouldn't complain.
In fact, I lead a multi-zone alliance and this starting time is bad for almost every one as EU members are working and a lot of American members haven't even gotten up.
Definitely not being able to choose the starting time is a huge step backwards.