**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
possible way to tell if someone in your alliance is banned
klobberintyme
Posts: 1,403 ★★★
Just an observation, not 100% sure across the board but after jumping around alliances I've noticed that when you sort on summoner leaderboard, you can see people missing from the list who may still show in the alliance member list - also if you're friends with banned guys they drop off from your friends filter list in leaderboard as well. Anyone else see this?
0
Comments
Deleting would be short sighted and unnecessary.
They can't go to shareholders and brag about the number of accounts they have because Kabam didn't have any public shareholders. Kabam was privately held, and Netmarble is also privately held. To the best of my knowledge, those numbers are not publicly reported.