**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Comments
No one said I was any different than anyone else here. I have things I don't agree with myself, just like anyone else.
Besides, even if one accepts your claim of interjecting with common sense to prevent emotional outbursts, then it’s clear your attempts have been a miserable failure. And that’s not because of other forum members.
Matter of fact is, A6 it’s permanent content and doesn’t have to be done NOW.
It’s not an EQ where you have a month to complete it and Kabam drops the bombshell only a week in advance.
As much as people say they have sunk resources into 4*s in preparation of A6, the fact that they are doing that, simply means their rosters’ depth for available champs to use in A6 isn’t up to par yet.
I’m F2P, have 5 R5s, 13 R4s, 6 6*s (3 are duped), 88 5*s and have stopped ranking 4*s since 5.4 was released (which I ran and gotten another Legends badge for).
When I brought up issues, people still intetjected there as well, regardless of who was right or wrong. It's an open Forum. If you present something, you need to be prepared for a rebuttal. That's how it works.
You can count the issues I've spoken out about on one hand, in 3 years. I'd say that's pretty composed.
Either way, I'm getting tired of this turning into some kind of character assassination, so I'm going back to the topic now. That's another thing I've had enough of, and in over 3 years, it never stops. Everyone needs a punching bag.
Just wondering...
Secondly, if you've been around long enough, you know that Offers are most often made long in advance, and aren't always connected to new content. In fact, the Email didn't even say anything about Act 6, just a Memorandum. One that made Crystals available to people not Uncollected, which doesn't even apply to the same demographic, considering people waiting on Act 6 are well past that. Again, no logic.
TL:DR - Not every decision that doesn't go over is a ploy to make money.
and i have yet to read any real counter from him. he has literally contradicted himself while going round in circles. Also if the above post about him complaining about Emma frost is true then that is further evidence to show his contradictory comments.
Now if we take the following quote from him prior to this multiple users have stated that given the choice they would rather use a r5/50 duped star lord then a r3/45 star lord. But even after being told the reasons why people want to potentially take their 4* into act 6 over their 5* he see's no reason why people can't just take their r3/45 5*
You aren't even at the point where this will affect you straight away, as you work your way through act 5 and then variant you will have the benefit of knowing about this restriction so won't be wasting valuable resources in 4* or even using the 4* rank up gems from Act 5 ( which are now useless in terms of progressing).
i do not really wish to continue the back and fourth as i believe you don't really share in the frustrations this decisions is causing and anything you say doesn't really help justify the use of this restriction or explain it in a way people find reasonable ( because its not really reasonable) also you just seem to fail to acknowledge why people are upset about this.
I respect your opinion is you don't see this restriction as a issue, and think it should be left there.
I doubt any of that is going to change regardless of how many posts show up in this thread. And as long as players dump resources into snowball’s-chance FGMCs, there’s no incentive to change anything.
Dr. Zola
use a progression based gate.
but not this.
it does disadvantage some long term players with bad rng and therefore bad rosters.
use a progression like this, Must be elders bane, must be more than 2yo account
just something better than no 4*.
Dr. Zola
i do not like the gate. never have and have always said i think its bad.
and always said that it will affect me badly.
i have always said that there should be a better option.
I have agreed there should be a gate.
and understood why they want a gate.
but not this.
the most i have said is it is wat it is and like it or not we need to deal with it.
and i will find a way.
that does not mean i like it and am for it.
that just means i will accept it.
#KabamAnsweringQuestions