**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Comments
Added arenas only work if the %ile pool is large enough AND the champs available are desirable. If you still have to put up 20-30M for a 5* basic HB you’ll never use in Act 6, it’s pointless.
Boss rush events suffer from the same issues related to pRNG: if they are structured like the last one in a way that heavily favors a handful of champs, it feels like just another penalty for bad pRNG. I have yet to see a special event crushable by an attack team of Stark Tech champs (sans IWIM) or SpiderVerse champs (sans Stark)—but that would be refreshing.
So there are ways to assuage the indignation over this decision. I suppose we will see whether they think that’s necessary.
Dr. Zola
So,,,yeah. I like the old system better I suppose. Implementing that with class 5* crystals would be great as well.
Dr. Zola
With not allowing 4*, I have very limited options for Act 6. I know, one of the obvious option is to wait till you get the right champs but this is my progression in two years. The motivation is just going down if this keeps up.
If for nothing else, 4*s have a great use for their synergies and to take that away from the player base completely hamstrings large sections of it and its not something you have adressed especially given how many of us have invested resources into them for that reason, forgetting we may actually play well with them. You will almost certainly slow player progression with this decision which no doubt will be demotivating and you run the risk of having it hit your back pocket which I guess is the only language kabam seems to understand.
i dont agree with most of wat GW says but i find that personalt attacks just start to devalue arguments and opinions.
when someone constantly attacks someone else it seems to devalue what they say.
and when a thread becomes littered with it it devalues the entire msg.
and there is one common theme here.
you have people saying just deal with it.
and you have people saying it sucks we shouldnt have to.
but.
Atleast practically everyone agrees it is a bad idea.
so regardless of deal with it or not, kabam needs to understand this.
EVERYONE thinks it is a bad idea.
surely you agree they could have done something else?
gated the content in an effective manner that would have been better.
They've decided to make this the gate people need to go through for Act 6. Not much can be done but look at solutions. We can't rely on 4*s indefinitely. We stopped using 3*s when Act 5 came. Actually, we stopped when we started Act 4, for the most part. If people want to make it mire challenging, try doing it with a 1/25 5*.
doesnt mean you cant take it out with 5* r3 HB, GAMBIT, COLOSSUS, AM, GROOT.
so you may have the skill but if thats the best you got.
the 4* roster there will far outshine those 5*. eveni if you ranked those 5* to r4 the 4* would still be my pick
There are more options than the troll pulls. Lol.
but it doesnt mean kabam did the right thing. and stop trying to get others to agree with you that it is ok wat they did.
it is not ok.
should we deal with it? yes.
but that doesnt make it right.
that may very well be exactly how someones roster looks.
you dont know that noone has a roster like that.
let people voice their opinions.
let them air their frustrations.
they are entitled to do that.
and maybe they have a good one or two if lucky.
you dsont have to have the last input.
you can let someone say thier piece without saying anything against it.
like i will be doing now.
i will now stop replying to you. i have said my piece and that is all there is.